241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20423576)
1. Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS.
Walker S; Mason AR; Claxton K; Cookson R; Fenwick E; Fleetcroft R; Sculpher M
Br J Gen Pract; 2010 May; 60(574):e213-20. PubMed ID: 20423576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis.
Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Walker S; Howe A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Apr; 12():94. PubMed ID: 22507660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.
Scott A; Sivey P; Ait Ouakrim D; Willenberg L; Naccarella L; Furler J; Young D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD008451. PubMed ID: 21901722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK.
Pandya A; Doran T; Zhu J; Walker S; Arntson E; Ryan AM
BMC Med; 2018 Aug; 16(1):135. PubMed ID: 30153827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for multimorbidity in pay for performance: a modelling study using UK Quality and Outcomes Framework data.
Ruscitto A; Mercer SW; Morales D; Guthrie B
Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Aug; 66(649):e561-7. PubMed ID: 27381486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: impact of implementing government proposals.
Caley M; Burn S; Marshall T; Rouse A
Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Jan; 64(618):e54-9. PubMed ID: 24567583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Mind the gap!" Evaluation of the performance gap attributable to exception reporting and target thresholds in the new GMS contract: National database analysis.
Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Howe A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jun; 8():131. PubMed ID: 18559086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Socioeconomic deprivation, coronary heart disease prevalence and quality of care: a practice-level analysis in Rotherham using data from the new UK general practitioner Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Strong M; Maheswaran R; Radford J
J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Mar; 28(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 16436452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nurse staffing and quality of care in UK general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely collected data.
Griffiths P; Murrells T; Maben J; Jones S; Ashworth M
Br J Gen Pract; 2010 Jan; 60(570):36-48. PubMed ID: 20040166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Pay-for Performance Incentive Levels be Determined Using a Cost-Effectiveness Framework?
Pandya A; Soeteman DI; Gupta A; Kamel H; Mushlin AI; Rosenthal MB
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2020 Jul; 13(7):e006492. PubMed ID: 32615799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Shepherd J; Jones J; Takeda A; Davidson P; Price A
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Aug; 10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. PubMed ID: 16904047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do the Quality and Outcomes Framework patient experience indicators reward practices that offer improved access?
Baker R; Bankart MJ; Murtagh GM
Br J Gen Pract; 2009 Aug; 59(565):e267-72. PubMed ID: 22751252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004-5.
Ashworth M; Armstrong D
BMC Fam Pract; 2006 Nov; 7():68. PubMed ID: 17096861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk-based, 6-monthly and 24-monthly dental check-ups for adults: the INTERVAL three-arm RCT.
Clarkson JE; Pitts NB; Goulao B; Boyers D; Ramsay CR; Floate R; Braid HJ; Fee PA; Ord FS; Worthington HV; van der Pol M; Young L; Freeman R; Gouick J; Humphris GM; Mitchell FE; McDonald AM; Norrie JD; Sim K; Douglas G; Ricketts D
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Nov; 24(60):1-138. PubMed ID: 33215986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Ashworth M; Seed P; Armstrong D; Durbaba S; Jones R
Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Jun; 57(539):441-8. PubMed ID: 17550668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incentive schemes to increase dementia diagnoses in primary care in England: a retrospective cohort study of unintended consequences.
Liu D; Green E; Kasteridis P; Goddard M; Jacobs R; Wittenberg R; Mason A
Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Mar; 69(680):e154-e163. PubMed ID: 30803980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying unintended consequences of quality indicators: a qualitative study.
Lester HE; Hannon KL; Campbell SM
BMJ Qual Saf; 2011 Dec; 20(12):1057-61. PubMed ID: 21693464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The cost-effectiveness of testing for hepatitis C in former injecting drug users.
Castelnuovo E; Thompson-Coon J; Pitt M; Cramp M; Siebert U; Price A; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Sep; 10(32):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-93. PubMed ID: 16948891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of clinical primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study.
Steel N; Maisey S; Clark A; Fleetcroft R; Howe A
Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Jun; 57(539):449-54. PubMed ID: 17550669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of financial incentives to help improve health outcomes: is the quality and outcomes framework fit for purpose? A systematic review.
Langdown C; Peckham S
J Public Health (Oxf); 2014 Jun; 36(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 23929885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
