125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20423867)
1. [Effect of Coflex interspinous stabilization and vertebral arch pedicle screw implantation on the stability of three-dimensional motions of the lumbar spine].
Mao ZX; Jiang JM; Yan HB; Zhao WD; Wang FL; Wu Y; Li Y
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Apr; 30(4):863-6. PubMed ID: 20423867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The optimal insertion position of the lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (Coflex): a biomechanical evaluation].
Zu D; Hai Y; Lu S; Yang J; Liu Y; Liu T; Meng X; Zhou L; Pang C
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 52(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 24785455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine.
Tsai KJ; Murakami H; Lowery GL; Hutton WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2006; 15(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 17087886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous fusion device and bilateral pedicle screw system as additional fixation for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 25577548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea.
Kettler A; Drumm J; Heuer F; Haeussler K; Mack C; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 17981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biomechanical evaluation of asymmetrical posterior internal fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with transfacetopedicular screws].
Ao J; Jin AM; Zhao WD; Zhang H; Min SX; Yu B; Chen WY
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 May; 29(5):959-61, 965. PubMed ID: 19460720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Bhatia NN; Lee KH; Bui CN; Luna M; Wahba GM; Lee TQ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E79-85. PubMed ID: 21629171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
