These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20424035)

  • 1. Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Krizan Z; Miller JC; Johar O
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20424035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partisan mathematical processing of political polling statistics: It's the expectations that count.
    Niemi L; Woodring M; Young L; Cordes S
    Cognition; 2019 May; 186():95-107. PubMed ID: 30769197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stressful politics: voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election.
    Stanton SJ; Labar KS; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Beehner JC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jun; 35(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 19962831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Picture yourself at the polls: visual perspective in mental imagery affects self-perception and behavior.
    Libby LK; Shaeffer EM; Eibach RP; Slemmer JA
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 17444910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The motivating function of thinking about the future: expectations versus fantasies.
    Oettingen G; Mayer D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Nov; 83(5):1198-212. PubMed ID: 12416922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smearing the opposition: implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. Presidential candidates and the current U.S. President.
    Kosloff S; Greenberg J; Schmader T; Dechesne M; Weise D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Aug; 139(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 20677891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social Security: a financial appraisal for the median voter.
    Galasso V
    Soc Secur Bull; 2001-2002; 64(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 12428510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Racial attitudes and visual cues in political judgments: support for Obama during the 2008 presidential election.
    West TV; Pearson AR; Dovidio JF; Johnson BT; Phills CE
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2014 Oct; 20(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 25090140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs.
    Cohen GL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Nov; 85(5):808-22. PubMed ID: 14599246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
    Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing and modeling an electoral campaign in the context of Twitter: 2011 Spanish Presidential election as a case study.
    Borondo J; Morales AJ; Losada JC; Benito RM
    Chaos; 2012 Jun; 22(2):023138. PubMed ID: 22757545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The multidimensional politics of inequality: taking stock of identity politics in the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    McCall L; Orloff AS
    Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S34-S56. PubMed ID: 29114864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A single exposure to the American flag shifts support toward Republicanism up to 8 months later.
    Carter TJ; Ferguson MJ; Hassin RR
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Aug; 22(8):1011-8. PubMed ID: 21742933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assumed policy similarity and voter preference.
    Quist RM; Crano WD
    J Soc Psychol; 2003 Apr; 143(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 12735515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Politicization during the 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections: bridging the personal and the political through an identity content approach.
    Turner-Zwinkels F; van Zomeren M; Postmes T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Mar; 41(3):433-45. PubMed ID: 25630374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voters and leaders in the mirror of politics: similarity in personality and voting choice in Italy and Spain.
    Vecchione M; González Castro JL; Caprara GV
    Int J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 46(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 22044270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.
    Eun SJ; Lee JY; Jung HM; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163763. PubMed ID: 27711213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.