These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20424036)

  • 1. Wishful seeing: more desired objects are seen as closer.
    Balcetis E; Dunning D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 20424036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal contraction: spatial binding in the perception of collision events.
    Buehner MJ; Humphreys GR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 20424021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Affective signals of threat increase perceived proximity.
    Cole S; Balcetis E; Dunning D
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jan; 24(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 23160204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resting on laurels: the effects of discrete progress markers as subgoals on task performance and preferences.
    Amir O; Ariely D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1158-71. PubMed ID: 18763898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Taking a hands-on approach: apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size.
    Linkenauger SA; Witt JK; Proffitt DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1432-41. PubMed ID: 21728460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance.
    Levin CA; Haber RN
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Aug; 54(2):250-9. PubMed ID: 8361840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Going, going, gone: localizing abrupt offsets of moving objects.
    Maus GW; Nijhawan R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):611-26. PubMed ID: 19485681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
    Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of visuomotor calibration and uncertainty on the perception of peripersonal space.
    Bourgeois J; Coello Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1268-83. PubMed ID: 22688494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drawing with divergent perspective, ancient and modern.
    Howard IP; Allison RS
    Perception; 2011; 40(9):1017-33. PubMed ID: 22208125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cost of forming more accurate impressions: accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal.
    Biesanz JC; Human LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 20424106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Action goals influence action-specific perception.
    Cañal-Bruland R; van der Kamp J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1100-5. PubMed ID: 19966262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives.
    Coventry KR; Valdés B; Castillo A; Guijarro-Fuentes P
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):889-95. PubMed ID: 18706538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses.
    Della Libera C; Chelazzi L
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):778-84. PubMed ID: 19422618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How perception impacts on drawings.
    Mitchell P; Ropar D; Ackroyd K; Rajendran G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 16262494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Close or far? Affect explains conflicting findings on motivated distance perception to rewards.
    Krpan D; Schnall S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():188-198. PubMed ID: 30125882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The art of anger: reward context turns avoidance responses to anger-related objects into approach.
    Aarts H; Ruys KI; Veling H; Renes RA; de Groot JH; van Nunen AM; Geertjes S
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1406-10. PubMed ID: 20855898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects.
    Brenner E; van Beers RJ; Rotman G; Smeets JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):811-25. PubMed ID: 16846281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection.
    Fischer MH
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 8043264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.