These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20424052)

  • 1. Memory for category information is idealized through contrast with competing options.
    Davis T; Love BC
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20424052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Situational information contributes to object categorization and inference.
    Chaigneau SE; Barsalou LW; Zamani M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 19041083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
    Livingston KR; Andrews JK
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of category-based induction: reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition (ITR) paradigm.
    Hayes BK; McKinnon R; Sweller N
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1430-41. PubMed ID: 18793074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferences from memory: strategy- and exemplar-based judgment models compared.
    Persson M; Rieskamp J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 18986638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ideals and category typicality.
    Kim S; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1092-112. PubMed ID: 21767059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature-based versus exemplar-based strategies in preschoolers' category learning.
    Krascum RM; Andrews S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Aug; 56(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 8366324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From chair to "chair": a representational shift account of object labeling effects on memory.
    Lupyan G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):348-69. PubMed ID: 18473663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accessible attitudes influence categorization of multiply categorizable objects.
    Smith ER; Fazio RH; Cejka MA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Nov; 71(5):888-98. PubMed ID: 8939039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural similarity and category-specificity: a refined account.
    Gerlach C; Law I; Paulson OB
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1543-53. PubMed ID: 15246291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.
    Förster J; Liberman N; Kuschel S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):579-99. PubMed ID: 18361673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can semi-supervised learning explain incorrect beliefs about categories?
    Kalish CW; Rogers TT; Lang J; Zhu X
    Cognition; 2011 Jul; 120(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 21474122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
    Smith JD; Minda JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior.
    Hammer R; Bar-Hillel A; Hertz T; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is.
    Grill-Spector K; Kanwisher N
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15686582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.
    Fazl A; Grossberg S; Mingolla E
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A probabilistic model of cross-categorization.
    Shafto P; Kemp C; Mansinghka V; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2011 Jul; 120(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 21377146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Look who's talking! Facial appearance can bias source monitoring.
    Nash RA; Bryer OM; Schlaghecken F
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 20408040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decoupling object detection and categorization.
    Mack ML; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1067-79. PubMed ID: 20731505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.