These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20424053)

  • 41. Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and nonmasked primes in a spatial negative priming task.
    Fitzgeorge L; Buckolz E; Khan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1435-52. PubMed ID: 21479723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
    Wang L; Yue Z; Chen Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):867-78. PubMed ID: 22415447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.
    Caddigan E; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):9. PubMed ID: 21135256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers.
    Fecteau JH
    J Vis; 2007 Apr; 7(6):1. PubMed ID: 17685784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.
    Maljkovic V; Nakayama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Oct; 58(7):977-91. PubMed ID: 8920835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pop-out in visual search requires practice.
    Boersema T; Zwaga HJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):355-65. PubMed ID: 8724902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.
    Huang L; Mo L; Li Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):414-28. PubMed ID: 22250865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search?
    Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search.
    Brascamp JW; Pels E; Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1972-8. PubMed ID: 21782839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Display size effects in visual search: analyses of reaction time distributions as mixtures.
    Reynolds A; Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):988-1009. PubMed ID: 19048454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Permeability of priming of pop out to expectations.
    Pascucci D; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysing the relationship between target-to-target and distractor-to-target repetitions: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Frings C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1641-9. PubMed ID: 18609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Target activation and distractor inhibition underlie priming of pop-out: A response to Dent (this issue).
    Lamy D; Zivony A
    Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():131-138. PubMed ID: 29678539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?
    Shih SI; Sperling G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):758-79. PubMed ID: 8666962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Target-to-target repetition cost and location negative priming are dissociable: evidence for different mechanisms.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1074-82. PubMed ID: 21553994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Temporal properties of visual search in pigeon target localization.
    Cook RG; Katz JS; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 22250790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
    Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Attentional selection of objects or features: evidence from a modified search task.
    Mounts JR; Melara RD
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):322-41. PubMed ID: 10089764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.