These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20424056)

  • 1. Why the parts are better (or worse) than the whole: the unique-attributes hypothesis.
    Chambers JR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 20424056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct-comparison judgments: when and why above- and below-average effects reverse.
    Windschitl PD; Conybeare D; Krizan Z
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):182-200. PubMed ID: 18248136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: geometric shapes and social categories.
    Rothbart M; Lewis S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Dec; 55(6):861-72. PubMed ID: 3216287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The comparative mind-set: from animal comparisons to increased purchase intentions.
    Xu AJ; Wyer RS
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Sep; 19(9):859-64. PubMed ID: 18947350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revisiting the picture-superiority effect in symbolic comparisons: do pictures provide privileged access?
    Amrhein PC; McDaniel MA; Waddill P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):843-57. PubMed ID: 12219794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When focusing on negative and positive attributes of the self elicits more inductive self-judgment.
    Klein WM; Monin MM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 35(3):376-84. PubMed ID: 19223459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Less may be more when choosing is difficult: choice complexity and too much choice.
    Greifeneder R; Scheibehenne B; Kleber N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 19766972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When standards are wide of the mark: nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in comparative judgments of objects and concepts.
    Giladi EE; Klar Y
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Dec; 131(4):538-51. PubMed ID: 12500862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cost of forming more accurate impressions: accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal.
    Biesanz JC; Human LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 20424106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Duration sensitivity depends on stimulus familiarity.
    Morewedge CK; Kassam KS; Hsee CK; Caruso EM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 19397378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention and attribute overlap in preferential choice.
    Bhatia S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1174-1196. PubMed ID: 27045894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The remembrance of times past: interference in temporal reference memory.
    Ogden RS; Wearden JH; Jones LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1524-44. PubMed ID: 19045991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Framing discrimination: effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments.
    Hugenberg K; Bodenhausen GV; McLain M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1020-31. PubMed ID: 17144762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avoidance behavior can function as a negative occasion setter.
    De Houwer J; Crombez G; Baeyens F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 15656731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of interference and retention delay on temporal generalization performance.
    Rattat AC; Droit-Volet S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1903-12. PubMed ID: 20952787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When tolerance leads to intolerance: accessibility effects on social judgment.
    Araya T; Ekehammar B
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 50(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19392948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proactive and retroactive effects of negative suggestion.
    Brown AS; Brown CM; Mosbacher JL; Dryden WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1234-43. PubMed ID: 17087580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization.
    Oppenheimer DM; Frank MC
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1178-94. PubMed ID: 17618616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.