These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20424095)

  • 1. How humans cognitively manage an abundance of mate options.
    Lenton AP; Francesconi M
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 20424095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of visual exposure to the opposite sex: cognitive aspects of mate attraction in human males.
    Roney JR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):393-404. PubMed ID: 15273016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Through evolution's eyes: extracting mate preferences by linking visual attention to adaptive design.
    Krupp DB
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Feb; 37(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18157626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Knowing your own mate value: sex-specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices.
    Back MD; Penke L; Schmukle SC; Asendorpf JB
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Aug; 22(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 21724949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age differences in choice satisfaction: a positivity effect in decision making.
    Kim S; Healey MK; Goldstein D; Hasher L; Wiprzycka UJ
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Mar; 23(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18361652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of color in mate choice of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus.
    Baldwin J; Johnsen S
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Nov; 212(Pt 22):3762-8. PubMed ID: 19880739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition.
    Phelps SM; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Jan; 167(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 16475097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Romantic interest in obese college students.
    Aruguete MS; Edman JL; Yates A
    Eat Behav; 2009 Aug; 10(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 19665095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive style in adults: task alternatives, task strategy, and time estimation.
    Kendall PC; Hooke JF; Rymer R; Finch AJ
    J Pers Assess; 1980 Apr; 44(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 7365677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focused attention deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.
    Levinoff EJ; Saumier D; Chertkow H
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 15708202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Romantic red: red enhances men's attraction to women.
    Elliot AJ; Niesta D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 95(5):1150-64. PubMed ID: 18954199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who recognizes and chooses behaviors that are best for a relationship? The separate roles of knowledge, attachment, and motivation.
    Turan B; Vicary AM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jan; 36(1):119-31. PubMed ID: 19884652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arbitrary social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity.
    Finkel EJ; Eastwick PW
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1290-5. PubMed ID: 19754525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast and frugal framing effects?
    McCloy R; Beaman CP; Frosch CA; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1043-52. PubMed ID: 20565220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive changes and retirement among senior surgeons (CCRASS): results from the CCRASS Study.
    Bieliauskas LA; Langenecker S; Graver C; Lee HJ; O'Neill J; Greenfield LJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jul; 207(1):69-78; discussion 78-9. PubMed ID: 18589364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraindividual variability in reaction time predicts cognitive outcomes 5 years later.
    Bielak AA; Hultsch DF; Strauss E; Macdonald SW; Hunter MA
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Nov; 24(6):731-41. PubMed ID: 20853957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in face cognition: brain-behavior relationships.
    Herzmann G; Kunina O; Sommer W; Wilhelm O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):571-89. PubMed ID: 19400675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks.
    Adam JJ; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1092-106. PubMed ID: 15584817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of visual, auditory, and mixed cues on choice reaction in Parkinson's disease.
    Akamatsu T; Fukuyama H; Kawamata T
    J Neurol Sci; 2008 Jun; 269(1-2):118-25. PubMed ID: 18279895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neurocognitive dysfunction in antidepressant-free, non-elderly patients with unipolar depression: alerting and covert orienting of visuospatial attention.
    Pardo JV; Pardo PJ; Humes SW; I Posner M
    J Affect Disord; 2006 May; 92(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16458363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.