134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20424666)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation methods for transcondylar fracture of the humerus:ONI plate versus conventional plates and screws.
Shimamura Y; Nishida K; Imatani J; Noda T; Hashizume H; Ohtsuka A; Ozaki T
Acta Med Okayama; 2010 Apr; 64(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 20424666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of a transcondylar screw from the dorsolateral plate support on the stabilization of orthogonal plate configuration in distal humeral fracture.
Hara A; Kudo T; Ichihara S; Iwase H; Nagao M; Maruyama Y; Kaneko K
Injury; 2019 Feb; 50(2):256-262. PubMed ID: 30579588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.
Scolaro JA; Hsu JE; Svach DJ; Mehta S
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 25249244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Locking plate fixation of humeral head fractures with a telescoping screw. A comparative biomechanical study versus a standard plate.
Gradl G; Stedtfeld HW; Morlock M; Sellenschloh K; Püschel K; Mittlmeier T; Gradl G
Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):734-8. PubMed ID: 21944432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Custom AO small T plate for transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly.
Imatani J; Ogura T; Morito Y; Hashizume H; Inoue H
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2005; 14(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 16337528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Schuhli augmentation of plate and screw fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a laboratory study.
Simon JA; Dennis MG; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ
J Orthop Trauma; 1999; 13(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 10206251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates.
Korner J; Diederichs G; Arzdorf M; Lill H; Josten C; Schneider E; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2004; 18(5):286-93. PubMed ID: 15105750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of three internal fixation configurations for low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus.
Zha Y; Hua K; Huan Y; Chen C; Sun W; Ji S; Xiao D; Gong M; Jiang X
Injury; 2023 Feb; 54(2):362-369. PubMed ID: 36509562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal fixation of the distal humerus: a biomechanical comparison of methods.
Helfet DL; Hotchkiss RN
J Orthop Trauma; 1990; 4(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 2231122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?
Hak DJ; Althausen P; Hazelwood SJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Apr; 24(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 20335752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of parallel versus orthogonal plate fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures.
Zalavras CG; Vercillo MT; Jun BJ; Otarodifard K; Itamura JM; Lee TQ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jan; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 21134662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures.
Stoffel K; Cunneen S; Morgan R; Nicholls R; Stachowiak G
J Orthop Res; 2008 Jun; 26(6):778-84. PubMed ID: 18203185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internal fixation of the distal humerus: a comprehensive biomechanical study evaluating current fixation techniques.
Caravaggi P; Laratta JL; Yoon RS; De Biasio J; Ingargiola M; Frank MA; Capo JT; Liporace FA
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Apr; 28(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 23899767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of orthogonal versus parallel double plating systems in intraarticular distal humerus fractures.
Atalar AC; Tunalı O; Erşen A; Kapıcıoğlu M; Sağlam Y; Demirhan MS
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Jan; 51(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 27965047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.
Röderer G; Scola A; Schmölz W; Gebhard F; Windolf M; Hofmann-Fliri L
Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1327-32. PubMed ID: 23769470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of plate material and screw design on stiffness and ultimate load of locked plating in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures.
Katthagen JC; Schwarze M; Warnhoff M; Voigt C; Hurschler C; Lill H
Injury; 2016 Mar; 47(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 26804939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
