These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20425093)
1. Endopyelotomy in the age of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. Yong D; Albala DM Curr Urol Rep; 2010 Mar; 11(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 20425093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results. Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children. Chandrasekharam VVS; Babu R J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Oct; 18(5):642-649. PubMed ID: 36117037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy? Andolfi C; Adamic B; Oommen J; Gundeti MS World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31506749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Secondary Management for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction after Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Re-Do Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Zhang Y; Ouyang W; Xu H; Luan Y; Yang J; Lu Y; Hu J; Liu Z; Yu X; Guan W; Hu Z; Ye Z; Wang S; Li H Urol Int; 2019; 103(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 31537001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: which is the best treatment today? Gallo F; Schenone M; Giberti C J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Oct; 19(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 19694571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution. Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of pediatric open pyeloplasty, laparoscopy-assisted extracorporeal pyeloplasty, and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Song SH; Lee C; Jung J; Kim SJ; Park S; Park H; Kim KS PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175026. PubMed ID: 28426695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Management of Adult UPJ Obstruction. Strother MC; Mucksavage P Curr Urol Rep; 2016 May; 17(5):39. PubMed ID: 26968419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Autorino R; Eden C; El-Ghoneimi A; Guazzoni G; Buffi N; Peters CA; Stein RJ; Gettman M Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):430-52. PubMed ID: 23856037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery]. Xiong SW; Wang J; Zhu WJ; Cheng SD; Zhang L; Li XS; Zhou LQ Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Aug; 52(4):794-798. PubMed ID: 32773819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in adult patients. Rasool S; Singh M; Jain S; Chaddha S; Tyagi V; Pahwa M; Pandey H J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):325-329. PubMed ID: 31222624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). González ST; Rosito TE; Tur AB; Ruiz J; Gozalbez R; Maiolo A; Tavares PM; Gorgen ARH; de Kencht EL; Madarriaga YQ; Weller S; Tobia IP; Castellan M; Corbetta JP Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(6):961-968. PubMed ID: 36083265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery. Salö M; Sjöberg Altemani T; Anderberg M Pediatr Surg Int; 2016 Jun; 32(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 26833312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves. Andolfi C; Lombardo AM; Aizen J; Recabal X; Walker JP; Barashi NS; Reed F; Lopez PJ; Wilcox DT; Gundeti MS World J Urol; 2022 Apr; 40(4):1049-1056. PubMed ID: 35044490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative efficacy and safety of different minimal invasive pyeloplasty in treating patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a network meta-analysis. Li P; Ma Y; Jin X; Xiang L; Li H; Wang K World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2659-2669. PubMed ID: 37566142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]