BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20426201)

  • 1. Improved modelling of ultrasound contrast agent diminution for blood perfusion analysis.
    Kier C; Meyer-Wiethe K; Seidel G; Mertins A
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):935-42. PubMed ID: 20426201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of quantitative perfusion parameters by dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography using a deconvolution method: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Gauthier M; Tabarout F; Leguerney I; Polrot M; Pitre S; Peronneau P; Lassau N
    J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Apr; 31(4):595-608. PubMed ID: 22441917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
    Quaia E
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Mar; 21(3):604-15. PubMed ID: 20927527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perfusion estimation using contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional subharmonic ultrasound imaging: an in vivo study.
    Sridharan A; Eisenbrey JR; Liu JB; Machado P; Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Zhao H; He Y; Park S; Dianis S; Wallace K; Thomenius KE; Forsberg F
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Sep; 48(9):654-60. PubMed ID: 23695085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perfusion parameters derived from bolus-tracking perfusion imaging are immune to tracer recirculation.
    Kosior JC; Frayne R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):753-6. PubMed ID: 20187222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rest-Stress Limb Perfusion Imaging in Humans with Contrast Ultrasound Using Intermediate-Power Imaging and Microbubbles Resistant to Inertial Cavitation.
    Davidson BP; Hodovan J; Belcik JT; Moccetti F; Xie A; Ammi AY; Lindner JR
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 May; 30(5):503-510.e1. PubMed ID: 28238588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and evaluation of indicator dilution models for bolus of ultrasound contrast agents.
    Harabis V; Kolar R; Mezl M; Jirik R
    Physiol Meas; 2013 Feb; 34(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 23348425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved contrast ultrasound with tissue harmonic minimizing pulse.
    Krishnan KB; Thomenius KE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):249-53. PubMed ID: 18334331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full angle spatial compounding for improved replenishment analyses in contrast perfusion imaging: in vitro studies.
    Hansen C; Hüttebräuker N; Wilkening W; Brunke S; Ermert H
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Apr; 55(4):819-31. PubMed ID: 18467226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Echo-power estimation from log-compressed video data in dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
    Payen T; Coron A; Lamuraglia M; Le Guillou-Buffello D; Gaud E; Arditi M; Lucidarme O; Bridal SL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1826-37. PubMed ID: 23879926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging the distribution of magnetic nanoparticles with ultrasound.
    Norton SJ; Vo-Dinh T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 17518060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parametric perfusion imaging based on low-cost ultrasound platform.
    Gu X; Zhong H; Wan M; Hu X; Lv D; Shen L; Zhang X
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 36(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 19931972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer.
    Franiel T; Hamm B; Hricak H
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Mar; 21(3):616-26. PubMed ID: 21184082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data weighting for principal component noise reduction in contrast enhanced ultrasound.
    Lueck G; Burns PN; Martel AL
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):76-83. PubMed ID: 17354758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonographic contrast-agent imaging of sub-millimeter vessel structures with spatial compounding: in vitro analyses.
    Hansen C; Hüttebräuker N; Wilkening W; Ashfaq M; Ermert H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Aug; 52(4):274-83. PubMed ID: 17691860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and transient arterial occlusion for quantification of arterial perfusion reserve in peripheral arterial disease.
    Amarteifio E; Wormsbecher S; Krix M; Demirel S; Braun S; Delorme S; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; Weber MA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3332-8. PubMed ID: 22285606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A high-resolution technique for ultrasound harmonic imaging using sparse representations in Gabor frames.
    Michailovich O; Adam D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1490-503. PubMed ID: 12588033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Real-Time Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Quantify Flow in an In Vitro Model: A Feasibility Study.
    Ruan SM; Zheng Q; Wang Z; Hu HT; Chen LD; Guo HL; Xie XY; Lu MD; Li W; Wang W
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Dec; 25():10029-10035. PubMed ID: 31879414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simulation environment for validating ultrasonic blood flow and vessel wall imaging based on fluid-structure interaction simulations: ultrasonic assessment of arterial distension and wall shear rate.
    Swillens A; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; Lovstakken L; Segers P
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4318-30. PubMed ID: 20879592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CREANUIS: a non-linear radiofrequency ultrasound image simulator.
    Varray F; Basset O; Tortoli P; Cachard C
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1915-24. PubMed ID: 23859896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.