324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20426579)
1. An electronic hand hygiene surveillance device: a pilot study exploring surrogate markers for hand hygiene compliance.
Sahud AG; Bhanot N; Radhakrishnan A; Bajwa R; Manyam H; Post JC
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 31(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 20426579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electronic monitoring and voice prompts improve hand hygiene and decrease nosocomial infections in an intermediate care unit.
Swoboda SM; Earsing K; Strauss K; Lane S; Lipsett PA
Crit Care Med; 2004 Feb; 32(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 14758148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Isolation status and voice prompts improve hand hygiene.
Swoboda SM; Earsing K; Strauss K; Lane S; Lipsett PA
Am J Infect Control; 2007 Sep; 35(7):470-6. PubMed ID: 17765560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring rates of hand hygiene adherence in the intensive care setting: a comparative study of direct observation, product usage, and electronic counting devices.
Marra AR; Moura DF; Paes AT; dos Santos OF; Edmond MB
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 31(8):796-801. PubMed ID: 20565261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring healthcare worker hand hygiene activity: current practices and emerging technologies.
Boyce JM
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1016-28. PubMed ID: 21931253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of an electronic device for real-time measurement of alcohol-based hand rub use.
Boyce JM; Cooper T; Dolan MJ
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 30(11):1090-5. PubMed ID: 19775238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Controlled trial measuring the effect of a feedback intervention on hand hygiene compliance in a step-down unit.
Marra AR; D'Arco C; Bravim Bde A; Martino MD; Correa L; Silva CV; Lamblet LC; Silva M; de Lima G; Guastelli LR; Barbosa L; dos Santos OF; Edmond MB
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 29(8):730-5. PubMed ID: 18631114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated hand hygiene count devices may better measure compliance than human observation.
Morgan DJ; Pineles L; Shardell M; Young A; Ellingson K; Jernigan JA; Day HR; Thom KA; Harris AD; Perencevich EN
Am J Infect Control; 2012 Dec; 40(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 22633134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New technologies to monitor healthcare worker hand hygiene.
Marra AR; Edmond MB
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Jan; 20(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 24245809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hand disinfection in a neonatal intensive care unit: continuous electronic monitoring over a one-year period.
Helder OK; van Goudoever JB; Hop WC; Brug J; Kornelisse RF
BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Oct; 12():248. PubMed ID: 23043639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Method for automated monitoring of hand hygiene adherence without radio-frequency identification.
Polgreen PM; Hlady CS; Severson MA; Segre AM; Herman T
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1294-7. PubMed ID: 20973724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability in the Hawthorne effect with regard to hand hygiene performance in high- and low-performing inpatient care units.
Kohli E; Ptak J; Smith R; Taylor E; Talbot EA; Kirkland KB
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 30(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 19199530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of hand sanitizer location on hand hygiene compliance.
Cure L; Van Enk R
Am J Infect Control; 2015 Sep; 43(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 26088769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying the Hawthorne Effect in Hand Hygiene Compliance Through Comparing Direct Observation With Automated Hand Hygiene Monitoring.
Hagel S; Reischke J; Kesselmeier M; Winning J; Gastmeier P; Brunkhorst FM; Scherag A; Pletz MW
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 36(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 25903555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive deviance: a new strategy for improving hand hygiene compliance.
Marra AR; Guastelli LR; de Araújo CM; dos Santos JL; Lamblet LC; Silva M; de Lima G; Cal RG; Paes AT; Cendoroglo Neto M; Barbosa L; Edmond MB; dos Santos OF
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 19925270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and effectiveness of an electronic hand hygiene feedback device targeted to improve rates of hand hygiene.
Sahud AG; Bhanot N; Narasimhan S; Malka ES
J Hosp Infect; 2012 Dec; 82(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 23102818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of hand hygiene monitoring using the 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene method versus a wash in-wash out method.
Sunkesula VC; Meranda D; Kundrapu S; Zabarsky TF; McKee M; Macinga DR; Donskey CJ
Am J Infect Control; 2015 Jan; 43(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 25564119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Compliance on hand-hygiene among healthcare providers working at secondary and tertiary general hospitals in Chengdu].
Han K; Dou FM; Zhang LJ; Zhu BP
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 32(11):1139-42. PubMed ID: 22336552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissemination and sustainability of a hospital-wide hand hygiene program emphasizing positive reinforcement.
Mayer J; Mooney B; Gundlapalli A; Harbarth S; Stoddard GJ; Rubin MA; Eutropius L; Brinton B; Samore MH
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 21128786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand hygiene practices among nursing staff in public secondary care hospitals in Kuwait: self-report and direct observation.
Al-Wazzan B; Salmeen Y; Al-Amiri E; Abul A; Bouhaimed M; Al-Taiar A
Med Princ Pract; 2011; 20(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 21576991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
