These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20426793)
1. Plant populations track rather than buffer climate fluctuations. Jongejans E; de Kroon H; Tuljapurkar S; Shea K Ecol Lett; 2010 Jun; 13(6):736-43. PubMed ID: 20426793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial and temporal variation in the relative contribution of density dependence, climate variation and migration to fluctuations in the size of great tit populations. Grøtan V; Saether BE; Engen S; van Balen JH; Perdeck AC; Visser ME J Anim Ecol; 2009 Mar; 78(2):447-59. PubMed ID: 19302127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity of the population growth rate to demographic variability within and between phases of the disturbance cycle. Morris WF; Tuljapurkar S; Haridas CV; Menges ES; Horvitz CC; Pfister CA Ecol Lett; 2006 Dec; 9(12):1331-41. PubMed ID: 17118007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental variation, stochastic extinction, and competitive coexistence. Adler PB; Drake JM Am Nat; 2008 Nov; 172(5):186-95. PubMed ID: 18817458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frog population viability under present and future climate conditions: a Bayesian state-space approach. McCaffery R; Solonen A; Crone E J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):978-85. PubMed ID: 22574643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecological change, range fluctuations and population dynamics during the Pleistocene. Hofreiter M; Stewart J Curr Biol; 2009 Jul; 19(14):R584-94. PubMed ID: 19640497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stochastic demography and population dynamics in the red kangaroo Macropus rufus. Jonzén N; Pople T; Knape J; Sköld M J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 19674179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting population survival under future climate change: density dependence, drought and extraction in an insular bighorn sheep. Colchero F; Medellin RA; Clark JS; Lee R; Katul GG J Anim Ecol; 2009 May; 78(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 19245378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chapter 4. Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction. Field IC; Meekan MG; Buckworth RC; Bradshaw CJ Adv Mar Biol; 2009; 56():275-363. PubMed ID: 19895977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The demographic impact of extreme events: stochastic weather drives survival and population dynamics in a long-lived seabird. Frederiksen M; Daunt F; Harris MP; Wanless S J Anim Ecol; 2008 Sep; 77(5):1020-9. PubMed ID: 18557956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context. Buckley YM; Ramula S; Blomberg SP; Burns JH; Crone EE; Ehrlén J; Knight TM; Pichancourt JB; Quested H; Wardle GM Ecol Lett; 2010 Sep; 13(9):1182-97. PubMed ID: 20561015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of larval host plants in the climate-driven range expansion of the butterfly Polygonia c-album. Braschler B; Hill JK J Anim Ecol; 2007 May; 76(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 17439459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence of local adaptation in the demographic response of American ginseng to interannual temperature variation. Souther S; McGraw JB Conserv Biol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):922-31. PubMed ID: 21676029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An empirical link between the spectral colour of climate and the spectral colour of field populations in the context of climate change. García-Carreras B; Reuman DC J Anim Ecol; 2011 Sep; 80(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 21466552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How is extinction risk related to population-size variability over time? A family of models for species with repeated extinction and immigration. Legendre S; Schoener TW; Clobert J; Spiller DA Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):282-98. PubMed ID: 18613775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the demographic buffering hypothesis with vital rates estimated for Weddell seals from 30 years of mark-recapture data. Rotella JJ; Link WA; Chambert T; Stauffer GE; Garrott RA J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):162-73. PubMed ID: 21939440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Buffering of life histories against environmental stochasticity: accounting for a spurious correlation between the variabilities of vital rates and their contributions to fitness. Morris WF; Doak DF Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):579-90. PubMed ID: 15122504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Demographic factors and genetic variation influence population persistence under environmental change. Willi Y; Hoffmann AA J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 19120814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Habitat change and plant demography: assessing the extinction risk of a formerly common grassland perennial. Schleuning M; Matthies D Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):174-83. PubMed ID: 18847437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective size of fluctuating populations with two sexes and overlapping generations. Engen S; Ringsby TH; Saether BE; Lande R; Jensen H; Lillegård M; Ellegren H Evolution; 2007 Aug; 61(8):1873-85. PubMed ID: 17683430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]