BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20427834)

  • 1. Cost comparison of femoral head banking versus bone substitutes.
    Leung HB; Fok MW; Chow LC; Yen CH
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Apr; 18(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 20427834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost analysis of fresh-frozen femoral head allografts: is it worthwhile to run a bone bank?
    Benninger E; Zingg PO; Kamath AF; Dora C
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1307-11. PubMed ID: 25274913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost comparison of femoral head banking versus bone substitutes.
    Shen WY
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Aug; 18(2):258; author reply 258-9. PubMed ID: 20808025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cost-effective method for femoral head allograft procurement for spinal arthrodesis: an alternative to commercially available allograft.
    Brown DA; Mallory GW; Higgins DM; Abdulaziz M; Huddleston PM; Nassr A; Fogelson JL; Clarke MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul; 39(15):E902-6. PubMed ID: 24827513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. B-cell lymphoma in retrieved femoral heads: a long term follow up.
    Zwitser EW; de Gast A; Basie MJ; van Kemenade FJ; van Royen BJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 May; 10():53. PubMed ID: 19457261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Autobanking of femoral heads for revision total hip replacement, a preliminary report of a new surgical technique.
    Hing CB; Ball RY; Tucker JK
    Surgeon; 2004 Feb; 2(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 15570805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient use of a limited resource femoral head allograft: A comparison of allograft preparation methods.
    Marshall T; Chow J; Sivakumar B; Ahmed N; Smith P
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(3):2309499017727952. PubMed ID: 28862101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simple novel bone bank storage: the Singapore General Hospital experience.
    Ang CY; Loh DS; Chaw HW; Chin PL
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2012 Dec; 10(6):526-8. PubMed ID: 24845139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Demand and supply of bone allograft and the role of orthopaedic surgeons.
    Abbas G; Bali SL; Abbas N; Dalton DJ
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2007 Aug; 73(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 17939482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone graft substitutes in hip revision surgery: a comprehensive overview.
    Beswick A; Blom AW
    Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 2():S40-6. PubMed ID: 21752368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iliac crest autogenous bone graft versus alloplastic graft and guided bone regeneration in the reconstruction of atrophic maxillae: a 5-year retrospective study on cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome.
    Dahlin C; Johansson A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 21087398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of bone banking in Central Serbia: audit of the first seven years.
    Stepanovic ZLj; Ristic BM
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2014 Dec; 15(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 24549703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-operative infection with fresh frozen allograft: reported outcomes of a hospital-based bone bank over 14 years.
    Man WY; Monni T; Jenkins R; Roberts P
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2016 Jun; 17(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 26910111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histopathology of femoral head donations: a retrospective review of 6161 cases.
    Mackie KE; Zhou Z; Robbins P; Bulsara M; Zheng MH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(16):1500-9. PubMed ID: 22204005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving efficiency of a regional stand alone bone bank.
    Warnock JM; Rowan CH; Davidson H; Millar C; McAlinden MG
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2016 Mar; 17(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 26138308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histopathology of retrieved allografts of the femoral head.
    Sugihara S; van Ginkel AD; Jiya TU; van Royen BJ; van Diest PJ; Wuisman PI
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1999 Mar; 81(2):336-41. PubMed ID: 10204947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbial contamination of femoral head allografts.
    Chiu CK; Lau PY; Chan SW; Fong CM; Sun LK
    Hong Kong Med J; 2004 Dec; 10(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 15591599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbiological culture results for the femoral head. Are they important to the donor?
    James LA; Ibrahim T; Esler CN
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Aug; 86(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 15330017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infections after bone allograft surgery: a prospective study by a hospital bone bank using frozen femoral heads from living donors.
    Kappe T; Cakir B; Mattes T; Reichel H; Flören M
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2010 Aug; 11(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 19562516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musculoskeletal tissue banking in Western Australia: review of the first ten years.
    Winter JM; Cowie AI; Wood DJ; Zheng MH
    ANZ J Surg; 2005 Aug; 75(8):665-71. PubMed ID: 16076329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.