BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20427863)

  • 1. Safe conversion to cicloral, a generic cylosporine, in both stable and de novo renal transplant recipients.
    Kahn D; Muller E; Pascoe M
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2010 May; 21(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 20427863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of generic cyclosporine microemulsion versus neoral in de novo renal transplant recipients managed by 2-hour postdose monitoring.
    Sharma A; Shekhar C; Heer M; Minz M
    Transplant Proc; 2006 Sep; 38(7):2051-3. PubMed ID: 16979996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical impact of 1:1 conversion from Neoral to a generic cyclosporine (Gengraf) in renal transplant recipients with stable graft function.
    Qazi YA; Forrest A; Tornatore K; Venuto RC
    Clin Transplant; 2006; 20(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16824147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to convert from traditional cyclosporine to the microemulsion formulation in stable renal transplant patients?
    Gaspari F; Perico N; Pisoni R; Anedda MF; Signorini O; Caruso R; Gotti E; Remuzzi G
    Clin Transplant; 1998 Oct; 12(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 9787945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-years experience with Neoral C2 monitoring adjusted to a target range of 500-600 ng/ml in long-term renal transplant recipients receiving dual immunosuppressive therapy.
    Carstens J
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 18432535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six-month clinical outcome of cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (Sigmasporin Microral) in stable renal transplant patients previously maintained on sandimmun neoral.
    Al Wakeel JS; Shaheen FA; Mathew MC; Abou Zeinab HM; Al Alfi A; Tarif NM; Al Mousawi MS; Mahmoud TS; Alorrayed AS; Fagir EA; Dham RS; Shaker DS
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Sep; 40(7):2245-51. PubMed ID: 18790205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and efficacy of generic cyclosporine arpimune in Filipino low-risk primary kidney transplant recipients.
    Pamugas GE; Danguilan RA; Lamban AB; Mangati VB; Ona ET
    Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 22310590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.
    Levy G; Grazi GL; Sanjuan F; Wu Y; Mühlbacher F; Samuel D; Friman S; Jones R; Cantisani G; Villamil F; Cillo U; Clavien PA; Klintmalm G; Otto G; Pollard S; McCormick PA
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 17004259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
    Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
    Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: is it worthwhile?
    Midtvedt K; Fauchald P; Bergan S; Høieggen A; Hallan S; Svarstad E; Bergrem H; Eriksen BO; Pfeffer PF; Dalen I; Leivestad T
    Transplantation; 2003 Oct; 76(8):1236-8. PubMed ID: 14578761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of changing from cyclosporine C0 to C2 monitoring in stable recipients following renal transplantation: a prospective cohort study.
    Zhang Y; Zhang XD; Wang Y
    Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3697-701. PubMed ID: 22172829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limitations of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
    Hmiel SP; Canter C; Shepherd R; Lassa-Claxton S; Nadler M
    Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 17631021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects of cyclosporine sandimmune versus the microemulsion neoral in heart transplant recipients.
    White M; Pelletier GB; Tan A; Jesina C; Carrier M
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1997 Aug; 16(8):787-94. PubMed ID: 9286770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimization of maintenance immunosuppression early after renal transplantation: an interim analysis.
    Bemelman FJ; de Maar EF; Press RR; van Kan HJ; ten Berge IJ; Homan van der Heide JJ; de Fijter HW
    Transplantation; 2009 Aug; 88(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 19667948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential clinical implications of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in transplant recipients.
    Johnston A; Belitsky P; Frei U; Horvath J; Hoyer P; Helderman JH; Oellerich M; Pollard S; Riad H; Rigotti P; Keown P; Nashan B
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Aug; 60(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 15205865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A phase III prospective, randomized study to evaluate concentration-controlled sirolimus (rapamune) with cyclosporine dose minimization or elimination at six months in de novo renal allograft recipients.
    Baboolal K
    Transplantation; 2003 Apr; 75(8):1404-8. PubMed ID: 12717239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (sigmasporin microral) effect as first-line immunosuppressant on renal functions at 3 years.
    Al Wakeel J; Shaheen FA; Al Alfi A; Abbas Fagir EH; Iman A; Nampoory MR; Al Mousawi MS; Said T; Abou Zeinab H; Shaker DS; Ghaedi BB
    Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 22310589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generic cyclosporine: a word of caution.
    Ponticelli C
    J Nephrol; 2004; 17 Suppl 8():S20-4. PubMed ID: 15599881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression using daclizumab bridge therapy in renal transplant recipients.
    Sundberg AK; Rohr MS; Hartmann EL; Adams PL; Stratta RJ
    Clin Transplant; 2004; 18 Suppl 12():61-6. PubMed ID: 15217410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of Iminoral compared with Neoral in healthy volunteers and renal transplant recipients.
    Sayyah M; Argani H; Pourmand GR; Amini H; Ahmadiani A
    Transplant Proc; 2007 May; 39(4):1214-8. PubMed ID: 17524936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.