These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20428723)

  • 21. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discarding the first of three nurse-auscultatory or oscillometric blood pressure measurements does not improve the association of office blood pressure with ABPM.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Jun; 15(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 20407368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison and correlation between self-measured blood pressure, casual blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
    Souza WK; Jardim PC; Porto LB; Araújo FA; Sousa AL; Salgado CM
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 97(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 21691677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acute blood pressure response in hypertensive elderly women immediately after water aerobics exercise: A crossover study.
    Cunha RM; Vilaça-Alves J; Noleto MV; Silva JS; Costa AM; Silva CN; Póvoa TI; Lehnen AM
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2017; 39(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 28045559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of the accuracy of indirect blood pressure measurements.
    Ochiai H; Miyazaki N; Miyata T; Mitake A; Tochikubo O; Ishii M
    Jpn Heart J; 1997 May; 38(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 9290574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct comparison of an automated oscillometric device with an electronic auscultatory device for epidemiologic survey to evaluate the prevalence of hypertension.
    Kim YM; Ohn DW; Kim SH; Kim DH; Park SM; Cho IJ; Ihm SH; Sung KC; Oh KW; Shin J; Lee EM
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Dec; 101(50):e32299. PubMed ID: 36550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical comparison of automated auscultatory and oscillometric and catheter-transducer measurements of arterial pressure.
    Davis RF
    J Clin Monit; 1985 Apr; 1(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 3831250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability of resting blood pressure measurement and classification using an oscillometric device in children with chronic kidney disease.
    Flynn JT; Pierce CB; Miller ER; Charleston J; Samuels JA; Kupferman J; Furth SL; Warady BA;
    J Pediatr; 2012 Mar; 160(3):434-440.e1. PubMed ID: 22048052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of blood pressure and pulse pressure values obtained by oscillometric and central measurements in hypertensive patients.
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Yilmaz R; Demir K; Dogan Y; Ozhan H; Alihanoglu Y; Koc F; Bodur S
    Blood Press; 2010 Apr; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 20070247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.
    Choi S; Kim YM; Shin J; Lim YH; Choi SY; Choi BY; Oh KW; Lee HM; Woo KJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?
    Mourad A; Carney S; Gillies A; Jones B; Nanra R; Trevillian P
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12764401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
    Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
    J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Factors related to the differences in blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory or oscillometric methods].
    Oltra MR; Vicente A; Vicente Lozano J; Forner MJ; Fabià MJ; Abdilla N; Redón J
    Med Clin (Barc); 2006 Nov; 127(18):688-91. PubMed ID: 17169294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Kinetics of Hypotension during 50 Sessions of Resistance and Aerobic Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Damorim IR; Santos TM; Barros GWP; Carvalho PRC
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 108(4):323-330. PubMed ID: 28380132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acute effect of bodyweight-based strength training on blood pressure of hypertensive older adults: A randomized crossover clinical trial.
    Silva ALD; de Oliveira SN; Vieira BA; Leite C; Martins DM; Moro ARP; Gerage AM; Delevatti RS
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2021 Apr; 43(3):223-229. PubMed ID: 33198514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How important is the recommended slow cuff pressure deflation rate for blood pressure measurement?
    Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2584-91. PubMed ID: 21735319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Augmented blood pressure measurement through the noninvasive estimation of physiological arterial pressure variability.
    Soueidan K; Chen S; Dajani HR; Bolic M; Groza V
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Jun; 33(6):881-99. PubMed ID: 22551623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.