These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20429137)

  • 21. [The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise].
    Fu PX; Wang J; Shi TT; Hu JN; Zhu MX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 20707283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How sick is the defendant? Forensic and emergency medical aspects at trial.
    Buschmann C; Peters M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Jan; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22981181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law.
    Salerno JM; Bottoms BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):273-96. PubMed ID: 19319835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Competence to proceed: a functional and context-determinative decision.
    Bennett GT; Sullwold AF
    J Forensic Sci; 1984 Oct; 29(4):1119-26. PubMed ID: 6502111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forensic psychiatry, neuroscience, and the law.
    Silva JA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):489-502. PubMed ID: 20018997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Ethical problems of insanity].
    Rutkowski R; Sobkowiak J
    Psychiatr Pol; 1991; 25(3-4):119-24. PubMed ID: 1821971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Through a glass darkly: functional neuroimaging evidence enters the courtroom.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2009 Jan; 60(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 19114565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
    Edmond G
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The limited role of neuroimaging in determining criminal liability: an overview and case report.
    Husted DS; Myers WC; Lui Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):e9-15. PubMed ID: 18499372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mental health courts as an alternative to criminal courts for those who have mental illness and have been charged with a crime.
    Powell J
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2003; 24(5):463; author reply 461. PubMed ID: 12775545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adjudicating pathological criminal incapacity within a climate of ultimate issue barriers: a comparative perspective.
    Stevens GP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 38():29-37. PubMed ID: 25681851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
    Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychological aspects of courtroom testimony.
    Loftus EF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 347():27-37. PubMed ID: 6930909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conceptualizing and characterizing accuracy in assessments of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 18802182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What's new in neuroimaging methods?
    Bandettini PA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Mar; 1156():260-93. PubMed ID: 19338512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.