These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Effects of local tissue conductivity on spherical and realistic head models. Bashar MR; Li Y; Wen P Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Sep; 33(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 20809133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG. Haueisen J; Tuch DS; Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Wedeen VJ; George JS; Belliveau JW Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 11771984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling. Fuchs M; Drenckhahn R; Wischmann HA; Wagner M IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):980-97. PubMed ID: 9691573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current. Heller L; Ranken D; Best E IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An equivalent current source model and laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity. He B; Yao D; Lian J; Wu D IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 11942719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [A review of mathematical descriptors of corneal asphericity]. Gatinel D; Haouat M; Hoang-Xuan T J Fr Ophtalmol; 2002 Jan; 25(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 11965125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electrode and brain modeling in stereo-EEG. von Ellenrieder N; Beltrachini L; Muravchik CH Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Sep; 123(9):1745-54. PubMed ID: 22364724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Eccentric spheres models of the head. Cuffin BN IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Sep; 38(9):871-8. PubMed ID: 1743735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The computational performance of a high-order coupled FEM/BEM procedure in electropotential problems. Bradley CP; Harris GM; Pullan AJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 48(11):1238-50. PubMed ID: 11686623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method. Meijs JW; Weier OW; Peters MJ; van Oosterom A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1989 Oct; 36(10):1038-49. PubMed ID: 2793196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation. Grant PF; Lowery MM Med Eng Phys; 2009 Nov; 31(9):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19656716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [An analysis of the dipole characteristics of the evoked potentials of the cerebral cortex]. Ponomarev VN; Tveritskaia IN Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1990; 40(6):1200-9. PubMed ID: 1965268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An improved method for localizing electric brain dipoles. Salu Y; Cohen LG; Rose D; Sato S; Kufta C; Hallett M IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):699-705. PubMed ID: 2394458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Numerical calculation of the potential distribution due to dipole sources in a spherical model of the head. Abboud S; Eshel Y; Levy S; Rosenfeld M Comput Biomed Res; 1994 Dec; 27(6):441-55. PubMed ID: 7895472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of conductivity changes in boundary element compartments on the forward and inverse problem in electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Haueisen J; Böttner A; Nowak H; Brauer H; Weiller C Biomed Tech (Berl); 1999 Jun; 44(6):150-7. PubMed ID: 10427910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]