These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20429287)
61. Dipole-quadrupole interaction in spherical nuclei and Berry potentials. LeTourneux J; Vinet L Phys Rev Lett; 1988 Sep; 61(13):1469-1472. PubMed ID: 10038806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Nonuniformity imprint on the ablation surface of laser-irradiated targets. Desselberger M; Afshar-rad T; Khattak F; Viana S; Willi O Phys Rev Lett; 1992 Mar; 68(10):1539-1542. PubMed ID: 10045157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Differential equation for the spherical dipole matrix elements of hydrogen. Price PN; Harmin DA Phys Rev A; 1990 Sep; 42(5):2555-2561. PubMed ID: 9904323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Comment on "Differential equation for the spherical dipole matrix elements of hydrogen". Braun PA Phys Rev A; 1992 Nov; 46(9):6108-6109. PubMed ID: 9908879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Reply to "Comment on 'Differential equation for the spherical dipole matrix elements of hydrogen' ". Price PN; Harmin DA Phys Rev A; 1992 Nov; 46(9):6110. PubMed ID: 9908880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. [Elements of clinical electroencephalography]. LOISEAU P J Med Bord; 1962 May; 139():591-651. PubMed ID: 14466354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. [Theoretical aspect of electroencephalography]. BREMER F Arch Neerl Physiol Homme Anim; 1948; 28(3-4):481-7. PubMed ID: 18874536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Exact solution of the mean spherical model for the electric microfield distribution in a plasma. Lado F Phys Rev A Gen Phys; 1986 Nov; 34(5):4131-4135. PubMed ID: 9897758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Problem of two fixed centers and a finite dipole: A unified treatment. Howard JE; Wilkerson TD Phys Rev A; 1995 Dec; 52(6):4471-4492. PubMed ID: 9912786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization. Musha T; Okamoto Y Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [The influence of mutual arrangement of the electric dipole and the spatial nonuniformity of brain electrical conductivity on the solution of the direct task of electroencephalography using the method of finite elements]. Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL Biofizika; 2010; 55(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20429287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model. Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Modeling the effect of the layer thickness and tissue conductivities of the head and the brain on the EEG potentials using finite element method]. Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL; Verkhliutov VM Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(6):742-52. PubMed ID: 18592709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling. Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]