142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20429760)
21. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes.
Holzapfel K; Duetsch S; Fauser C; Eiber M; Rummeny EJ; Gaa J
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 18995981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nonpalpable supraclavicular lymph nodes in lung cancer patients: preoperative characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Sung YM; Lee KS; Kim BT; Kim S; Kwon OJ; Choi JY; Yang SO
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):246-52. PubMed ID: 18094319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Enlarged cervical lymph nodes at helical CT.
Steinkamp HJ; Hosten N; Richter C; Schedel H; Felix R
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):795-8. PubMed ID: 8184067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Patterns of contrast enhancement of tuberculous lymph nodes demonstrated by computed tomography.
Pombo F; Rodríguez E; Mato J; Pérez-Fontán J; Rivera E; Valvuena L
Clin Radiol; 1992 Jul; 46(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 1643775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contribution of the amount of contrast media used in pulmonary CT angiography to assess the diagnostic value of CT venography; comparison of 100 and 150ml of contrast media.
Calisir C; Yavas US; Kebapci M; Korkmaz A; Ozkan R
Clin Radiol; 2009 Sep; 64(9):912-7. PubMed ID: 19664482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dual-energy CT-based iodine quantification to differentiate abdominal malignant lymphoma from lymph node metastasis.
Martin SS; Czwikla R; Wichmann JL; Albrecht MH; Lenga L; Savage RH; Arendt C; Hammerstingl R; Vogl TJ; Kaltenbach B
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():255-260. PubMed ID: 30017291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Primary mediastinal lymphoma: characteristic features of the various histological subtypes on CT.
Tateishi U; Müller NL; Johkoh T; Onishi Y; Arai Y; Satake M; Matsuno Y; Tobinai K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(6):782-9. PubMed ID: 15538151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection rate and efficiency of lymph node assessment with axial and coronal image reading based on 16 row multislice CT of the neck.
Schreyer AG; Scheibl K; Zorger N; Dorenbeck U; Retzl G; Feuerbach S; Seitz J
Rofo; 2005 Oct; 177(10):1430-5. PubMed ID: 16170714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of superficial lymph nodes.
Poantă L; Pop S; Cosgarea M; Fodor D
Rom J Intern Med; 2012; 50(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 23330285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contrast enhancement of pathologic lymph nodes demonstrated by computed tomography.
Magnusson A; Andersson T; Larsson B; Hagberg H; Sundström CH
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 2736185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT.
Awai K; Inoue M; Yagyu Y; Watanabe M; Sano T; Nin S; Koike R; Nishimura Y; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tuberculosis versus lymphoma in the abdominal lymph nodes: a comparative study using contrast-enhanced MRI.
Shao H; Yang ZG; Deng W; Chen J; Tang SS; Wen LY
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2513-7. PubMed ID: 22154603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.
Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lymph-node metastases: efficacy for detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer.
Fukuya T; Honda H; Hayashi T; Kaneko K; Tateshi Y; Ro T; Maehara Y; Tanaka M; Tsuneyoshi M; Masuda K
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):705-11. PubMed ID: 7480743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the staging of malignant lymphoma compared with CT and 67Ga scan.
Hong SP; Hahn JS; Lee JD; Bae SW; Youn MJ
Yonsei Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):779-86. PubMed ID: 14584092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tuberculosis versus lymphomas in the abdominal lymph nodes: evaluation with contrast-enhanced CT.
Yang ZG; Min PQ; Sone S; He ZY; Liao ZY; Zhou XP; Yang GQ; Silverman PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 10063847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feasibility of interstitial CT lymphography using optimized iodized oil emulsion in rats.
Chung YE; Hyung WJ; Kweon S; Lim SJ; Choi J; Lee MH; Kim H; Myoung S; Lim JS
Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 20065857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CT diagnosis of 52 patients with lymphoma in abdominal lymph nodes.
Yu RS; Zhang WM; Liu YQ
World J Gastroenterol; 2006 Dec; 12(48):7869-73. PubMed ID: 17203536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy.
Zhang Y; Chen J; Shen J; Zhong J; Ye R; Liang B
Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 22316593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
