These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20430048)
1. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention. Benoni H; Tsal Y Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. Tsal Y; Benoni H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1645-56. PubMed ID: 20822300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Competition between color salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down set. Biggs AT; Gibson BS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 20045879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction. Mevorach C; Tsal Y; Humphreys GW Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():966. PubMed ID: 24454297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Constraints on dilution from a narrow attentional zoom reveal how spatial and color cues direct selection. Chen Z; Cave KR Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():125-37. PubMed ID: 24973562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010). Lavie N; Torralbo A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition. Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs. Wykowska A; Schubö A J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience? Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load. Lavie N; Robertson IH J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 11595091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load. Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity. Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels. Caparos S; Linnell KJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential and dipole modeling study. Fu S; Zinni M; Squire PN; Kumar R; Caggiano DM; Parasuraman R Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1345-55. PubMed ID: 18006335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attention to local form information can prevent access to semantic information. Murray JE; Jones C Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):609-25. PubMed ID: 12047062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]