171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20430209)
1. The survival of heart transplant recipients using cyclosporine and everolimus is not inferior to that using cyclosporine and mycophenolate.
Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Huang SC; Wu IH; Wang CH; Yu HY; Chen YS; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Shun CT
Transplant Proc; 2010 Apr; 42(3):938-9. PubMed ID: 20430209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heart transplantation under cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil or everolimus.
Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Wu IH; Chen YS; Yu HY; Huang SC; Wang CH; Ko WJ; Tsao CI; Sun CD
Transplant Proc; 2008 Oct; 40(8):2607-8. PubMed ID: 18929814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy compared by intravascular ultrasound sonography: everolimus to mycophenolate mofetil--one single-center experience.
Chou NK; Jan CF; Chi NH; Lee CM; Wu IH; Huang SC; Chen YS; Yu HY; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Chu SH; Wang SS
Transplant Proc; 2012 May; 44(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 22564578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 1-year randomized controlled study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil with reduced-dose cyclosporine in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
Bara C; Dengler T; Hack MA; Ladenburger S; Lehmkuhl HB
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2387-92. PubMed ID: 23953553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study.
Potena L; Prestinenzi P; Bianchi IG; Masetti M; Romani P; Magnani G; Fallani F; Coccolo F; Russo A; Ponticelli C; Rapezzi C; Grigioni F; Branzi A
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2012 Jun; 31(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 22341702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Everolimus with reduced cyclosporine versus MMF with standard cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.
Lehmkuhl HB; Arizon J; Viganò M; Almenar L; Gerosa G; Maccherini M; Varnous S; Musumeci F; Hexham JM; Mange KC; Livi U;
Transplantation; 2009 Jul; 88(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19584690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant recipients treated with two immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine.
Spagnoletti G; Citterio F; Favi E; Rossi E; Delreno F; De Santis I; Salerno MP; Gargiulo A; Castagneto M
Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1175-7. PubMed ID: 19460509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observational study with everolimus (Certican) in combination with low-dose cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.
Lehmkuhl HB; Mai D; Dandel M; Knosalla C; Hiemann NE; Grauhan O; Huebler M; Pasic M; Weng Y; Meyer R; Rothenburger M; Hummel M; Hetzer R
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2007 Jul; 26(7):700-4. PubMed ID: 17613400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study.
Viganò M; Dengler T; Mattei MF; Poncelet A; Vanhaecke J; Vermes E; Kleinloog R; Li Y; Gezahegen Y; Delgado JF;
Transpl Infect Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19744284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine a in combination with mycophenolate mofetil after heart transplantation.
Guethoff S; Meiser BM; Groetzner J; Eifert S; Grinninger C; Ueberfuhr P; Reichart B; Hagl C; Kaczmarek I
Transplantation; 2013 Feb; 95(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 23423270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome in heart transplant recipients receiving everolimus in combination with dosage reduction of the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine A or tacrolimus.
Fuchs U; Zittermann A; Ensminger SM; Schulz U; Gummert JF
Transpl Immunol; 2014 Aug; 31(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 24932812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of four different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: five-year outcomes.
Anil Kumar MS; Irfan Saeed M; Ranganna K; Malat G; Sustento-Reodica N; Kumar AM; Meyers WC
Transpl Immunol; 2008 Nov; 20(1-2):32-42. PubMed ID: 18773960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Everolimus but not mycophenolate mofetil therapy is associated with soluble HLA-G expression in heart transplant patients.
Sheshgiri R; Gustafsson F; Sheedy J; Rao V; Ross HJ; Delgado DH
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1193-7. PubMed ID: 19783164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of everolimus versus mycophenolate on blood and lymphocyte cyclosporine exposure in heart-transplant recipients.
Gustafsson F; Barth D; Delgado DH; Nsouli M; Sheedy J; Ross HJ
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 65(7):659-65. PubMed ID: 19458944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Everolimus and reduced cyclosporine trough levels in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
Schweiger M; Wasler A; Prenner G; Stiegler P; Stadlbauer V; Schwarz M; Tscheliessnigg K
Transpl Immunol; 2006 Jun; 16(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 16701176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can cyclosporine blood level be reduced to half after heart transplantation?
Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Huang SC; Wu IH; Wang CH; Yu HY; Chen YS; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Shun CT
Transplant Proc; 2010 Apr; 42(3):930-3. PubMed ID: 20430207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. De novo everolimus-based therapy in renal transplant recipients: effect on proteinuria and renal prognosis.
Loriga G; Ciccarese M; Pala PG; Satta RP; Fanelli V; Manca ML; Serra G; Dessole P; Cossu M
Transplant Proc; 2010 May; 42(4):1297-302. PubMed ID: 20534285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimization of maintenance immunosuppression early after renal transplantation: an interim analysis.
Bemelman FJ; de Maar EF; Press RR; van Kan HJ; ten Berge IJ; Homan van der Heide JJ; de Fijter HW
Transplantation; 2009 Aug; 88(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 19667948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mycophenolate mofetil may allow cyclosporine and steroid sparing in de novo heart transplant patients.
Hamour IM; Lyster HS; Burke MM; Rose ML; Banner NR
Transplantation; 2007 Mar; 83(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 17353776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.
Dösch AO; Ehlermann P; Koch A; Remppis A; Katus HA; Dengler TJ
Clin Ther; 2006 Jun; 28(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16860172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
