These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20430209)

  • 1. The survival of heart transplant recipients using cyclosporine and everolimus is not inferior to that using cyclosporine and mycophenolate.
    Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Huang SC; Wu IH; Wang CH; Yu HY; Chen YS; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Shun CT
    Transplant Proc; 2010 Apr; 42(3):938-9. PubMed ID: 20430209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heart transplantation under cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil or everolimus.
    Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Wu IH; Chen YS; Yu HY; Huang SC; Wang CH; Ko WJ; Tsao CI; Sun CD
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Oct; 40(8):2607-8. PubMed ID: 18929814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy compared by intravascular ultrasound sonography: everolimus to mycophenolate mofetil--one single-center experience.
    Chou NK; Jan CF; Chi NH; Lee CM; Wu IH; Huang SC; Chen YS; Yu HY; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Chu SH; Wang SS
    Transplant Proc; 2012 May; 44(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 22564578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 1-year randomized controlled study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil with reduced-dose cyclosporine in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
    Bara C; Dengler T; Hack MA; Ladenburger S; Lehmkuhl HB
    Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2387-92. PubMed ID: 23953553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study.
    Potena L; Prestinenzi P; Bianchi IG; Masetti M; Romani P; Magnani G; Fallani F; Coccolo F; Russo A; Ponticelli C; Rapezzi C; Grigioni F; Branzi A
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2012 Jun; 31(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 22341702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Everolimus with reduced cyclosporine versus MMF with standard cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.
    Lehmkuhl HB; Arizon J; Viganò M; Almenar L; Gerosa G; Maccherini M; Varnous S; Musumeci F; Hexham JM; Mange KC; Livi U;
    Transplantation; 2009 Jul; 88(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19584690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant recipients treated with two immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine.
    Spagnoletti G; Citterio F; Favi E; Rossi E; Delreno F; De Santis I; Salerno MP; Gargiulo A; Castagneto M
    Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1175-7. PubMed ID: 19460509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observational study with everolimus (Certican) in combination with low-dose cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.
    Lehmkuhl HB; Mai D; Dandel M; Knosalla C; Hiemann NE; Grauhan O; Huebler M; Pasic M; Weng Y; Meyer R; Rothenburger M; Hummel M; Hetzer R
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2007 Jul; 26(7):700-4. PubMed ID: 17613400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study.
    Viganò M; Dengler T; Mattei MF; Poncelet A; Vanhaecke J; Vermes E; Kleinloog R; Li Y; Gezahegen Y; Delgado JF;
    Transpl Infect Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19744284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine a in combination with mycophenolate mofetil after heart transplantation.
    Guethoff S; Meiser BM; Groetzner J; Eifert S; Grinninger C; Ueberfuhr P; Reichart B; Hagl C; Kaczmarek I
    Transplantation; 2013 Feb; 95(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 23423270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcome in heart transplant recipients receiving everolimus in combination with dosage reduction of the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine A or tacrolimus.
    Fuchs U; Zittermann A; Ensminger SM; Schulz U; Gummert JF
    Transpl Immunol; 2014 Aug; 31(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 24932812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of four different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: five-year outcomes.
    Anil Kumar MS; Irfan Saeed M; Ranganna K; Malat G; Sustento-Reodica N; Kumar AM; Meyers WC
    Transpl Immunol; 2008 Nov; 20(1-2):32-42. PubMed ID: 18773960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Everolimus but not mycophenolate mofetil therapy is associated with soluble HLA-G expression in heart transplant patients.
    Sheshgiri R; Gustafsson F; Sheedy J; Rao V; Ross HJ; Delgado DH
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1193-7. PubMed ID: 19783164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of everolimus versus mycophenolate on blood and lymphocyte cyclosporine exposure in heart-transplant recipients.
    Gustafsson F; Barth D; Delgado DH; Nsouli M; Sheedy J; Ross HJ
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 65(7):659-65. PubMed ID: 19458944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Everolimus and reduced cyclosporine trough levels in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
    Schweiger M; Wasler A; Prenner G; Stiegler P; Stadlbauer V; Schwarz M; Tscheliessnigg K
    Transpl Immunol; 2006 Jun; 16(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 16701176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can cyclosporine blood level be reduced to half after heart transplantation?
    Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Huang SC; Wu IH; Wang CH; Yu HY; Chen YS; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Shun CT
    Transplant Proc; 2010 Apr; 42(3):930-3. PubMed ID: 20430207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. De novo everolimus-based therapy in renal transplant recipients: effect on proteinuria and renal prognosis.
    Loriga G; Ciccarese M; Pala PG; Satta RP; Fanelli V; Manca ML; Serra G; Dessole P; Cossu M
    Transplant Proc; 2010 May; 42(4):1297-302. PubMed ID: 20534285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimization of maintenance immunosuppression early after renal transplantation: an interim analysis.
    Bemelman FJ; de Maar EF; Press RR; van Kan HJ; ten Berge IJ; Homan van der Heide JJ; de Fijter HW
    Transplantation; 2009 Aug; 88(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 19667948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mycophenolate mofetil may allow cyclosporine and steroid sparing in de novo heart transplant patients.
    Hamour IM; Lyster HS; Burke MM; Rose ML; Banner NR
    Transplantation; 2007 Mar; 83(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 17353776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.
    Dösch AO; Ehlermann P; Koch A; Remppis A; Katus HA; Dengler TJ
    Clin Ther; 2006 Jun; 28(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16860172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.