267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20430289)
1. Cost-effectiveness of breech version by acupuncture-type interventions on BL 67, including moxibustion, for women with a breech foetus at 33 weeks gestation: a modelling approach.
van den Berg I; Kaandorp GC; Bosch JL; Duvekot JJ; Arends LR; Hunink MG
Complement Ther Med; 2010 Apr; 18(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 20430289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost effectiveness of using moxibustion to correct non-vertex presentation.
García-Mochón L; Martín JJ; Aranda-Regules JM; Rivas-Ruiz F; Vas J
Acupunct Med; 2015 Apr; 33(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 25669428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting the success of moxibustion in the management of a breech presentation as a preliminary treatment to external cephalic version.
Manyande A; Grabowska C
Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 19853333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].
Lojacono A; Donarini G; Valcamonico A; Soregaroli M; Frusca T
Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 14676741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation.
Coyle ME; Smith CA; Peat B
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD003928. PubMed ID: 22592693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acupuncture plus moxibustion to resolve breech presentation: a randomized controlled study.
Neri I; Airola G; Contu G; Allais G; Facchinetti F; Benedetto C
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 15280133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised controlled trial of moxibustion for breech presentation.
Cardini F; Lombardo P; Regalia AL; Regaldo G; Zanini A; Negri MG; Panepuccia L; Todros T
BJOG; 2005 Jun; 112(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 15924530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis.
Gifford DS; Keeler E; Kahn KL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):930-6. PubMed ID: 7770262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1997-2004.
Nassar N; Roberts CL; Cameron CA; Peat B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1231-8. PubMed ID: 17068683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oral nifepidine versus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for external cephalic version: a double-blind randomised trial.
Collaris R; Tan PC
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(1):74-80; discussion 80-1. PubMed ID: 19087079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moxibustion for breech presentation.
Budd S
Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery; 2000 Nov; 6(4):176-9. PubMed ID: 11858300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands.
Rijnders M; Herschderfer K; Prins M; van Baaren R; van Veelen AJ; Schönbeck Y; Buitendijk S
Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17196716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expectant parents' preferences for mode of delivery and trade-offs of outcomes for breech presentation.
Kok M; Gravendeel L; Opmeer BC; van der Post JA; Mol BW
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Aug; 72(2):305-10. PubMed ID: 18534810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moxibustion for Cephalic Version of Breech Presentation.
Schlaeger JM; Stoffel CL; Bussell JL; Cai HY; Takayama M; Yajima H; Takakura N
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 May; 63(3):309-322. PubMed ID: 29775226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [External cephalic version of breech presentation].
Sande HA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Oct; 113(25):3153-4. PubMed ID: 8273041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [External cephalic version as a possible treatment of breech presentation].
Giusti M; Bertolotti GC; Nappi RE; Fignon A; Zara C
Minerva Ginecol; 2000 Jun; 52(6):221-7. PubMed ID: 11085044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation.
Coyle ME; Smith CA; Peat B
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Apr; (2):CD003928. PubMed ID: 15846688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
