425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20430413)
41. Pandemic pharmaceutical dosing effects on wastewater treatment: no adaptation of activated sludge bacteria to degrade the antiviral drug oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) and loss of nutrient removal performance.
Slater FR; Singer AC; Turner S; Barr JJ; Bond PL
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2011 Feb; 315(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 21133989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A sequencing batch reactor system for high-level biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal from abattoir wastewater.
Lemaire R; Yuan Z; Bernet N; Marcos M; Yilmaz G; Keller J
Biodegradation; 2009 Jun; 20(3):339-50. PubMed ID: 18937035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Biological nutrient removal in a small-scale MBR treating household wastewater.
Abegglen C; Ospelt M; Siegrist H
Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):338-46. PubMed ID: 17707877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Utilising laboratory experiments as a first step to introduce primary sludge hydrolysis in full-scale.
Jönsson K; Pottier A; Dimitrova I; Nyberg U
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18496005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Climate change impacts on activated sludge wastewater treatment: a case study from Norway.
Plósz BG; Liltved H; Ratnaweera H
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 19633397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Experiences with a large-size WWTP based on activated sludge-biofiltration processes: 25 months of operation.
Licskó I; Szabó GC; Melicz Z
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):285-93. PubMed ID: 15537018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Occurrence and removal of titanium at full scale wastewater treatment plants: implications for TiO2 nanomaterials.
Westerhoff P; Song G; Hristovski K; Kiser MA
J Environ Monit; 2011 May; 13(5):1195-203. PubMed ID: 21494702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Tracking the inorganic suspended solids through biological treatment units of wastewater treatment plants.
Ekama GA; Wentzel MC; Sötemann SW
Water Res; 2006 Nov; 40(19):3587-95. PubMed ID: 16949122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) regulation of nutrient removal in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants.
Li B; Bishop P
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 12216649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of endotoxin activity in wastewater treatment plants.
Guizani M; Dhahbi M; Funamizu N
J Environ Monit; 2009 Jul; 11(7):1421-7. PubMed ID: 20449233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Low-temperature inhibition of the activated sludge process by an industrial discharge containing the azo dye acid black 1.
Martin RW; Robert Baillod C; Mihelcic JR
Water Res; 2005 Jan; 39(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 15607160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Impact of solids management on nutrient ratios for in-line wastewater prefermenters.
Rössle WH; Pretorius WA
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):77-83. PubMed ID: 11548024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The fate of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the wastewater treatment process and its importance in the removal of wastewater contaminants.
Katsoyiannis A; Samara C
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2007 Jul; 14(5):284-92. PubMed ID: 17722762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Full-scale demonstration of biological nutrient removal in a single tank SBR process.
Keller J; Watts S; Battye-Smith W; Chong R
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 11381928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The solids retention time-a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants.
Clara M; Kreuzinger N; Strenn B; Gans O; Kroiss H
Water Res; 2005 Jan; 39(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 15607169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor.
Tawfik A; El-Gohary F; Temmink H
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Feb; 33(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 19404682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Occurrence and removal of estrogens and beta blockers by various processes in wastewater treatment plants.
Gabet-Giraud V; Miège C; Choubert JM; Ruel SM; Coquery M
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(19):4257-69. PubMed ID: 20633734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. DEAMOX--new biological nitrogen removal process based on anaerobic ammonia oxidation coupled to sulphide-driven conversion of nitrate into nitrite.
Kalyuzhnyi S; Gladchenko M; Mulder A; Versprille B
Water Res; 2006 Nov; 40(19):3637-45. PubMed ID: 16893559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The effects of nutrient limitation (nitrogen and phosphorus) on BOD removal from post-coagulated Pinus radiata sulfite pulp and paper mill wastewater in a baffled aerated stabilisation basin-laboratory pilot scale study.
Dewi R; Van Leeuwen JA; Everson A; Nothrop SC; Chow CW
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 21278472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of wastewater composition on biological nutrient removal in UniFed SBR process.
Zhao CH; Peng YZ; Wang SY; Tang XG
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):803-10. PubMed ID: 18776615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
