BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20430576)

  • 1. Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: study from highest ranked journals.
    Reveiz L; Cortés-Jofré M; Asenjo Lobos C; Nicita G; Ciapponi A; Garcìa-Dieguez M; Tellez D; Delgado M; Solà I; Ospina E;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1216-22. PubMed ID: 20430576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adherence to guidelines for improved quality of data reporting: where are we today?
    Elia N; Tramèr MR
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):478-80. PubMed ID: 21659804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of reporting in randomized trials.
    Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2010 Apr; 89(4):150. PubMed ID: 20397138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes as governed by the CONSORT statement.
    Ziogas DC; Zintzaras E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 19(7):494-500. PubMed ID: 19523596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):713-21. PubMed ID: 20546823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals.
    Sinha S; Sinha S; Ashby E; Jayaram R; Grocott MP
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):565-571.e1. PubMed ID: 19854395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.
    Lai TY; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS; Leung GM
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 18161613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter.
    von Elm E
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):483-4. PubMed ID: 21659806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
    Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals.
    Khan MS; Shaikh A; Ochani RK; Akhtar T; Fatima K; Khan SU; Mookadam F; Murad MH; Figueredo VM; Doukky R; Krasuski RA
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 May; 12(5):e005260. PubMed ID: 31030545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in dental public health.
    Marshman Z; Farid F
    Community Dent Health; 2010 Dec; 27(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 21473363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of reporting in infertility journals.
    Glujovsky D; Boggino C; Riestra B; Coscia A; Sueldo CE; Ciapponi A
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 25455871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed journal-related bias.
    Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):660-4. PubMed ID: 20097531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Haidich AB; Birtsou C; Dardavessis T; Tirodimos I; Arvanitidou M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):124-35. PubMed ID: 21172601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals.
    Janackovic K; Puljak L
    Trials; 2018 Oct; 19(1):591. PubMed ID: 30373644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals.
    Dumbrigue HB; Jones JS; Esquivel JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications.
    Tharyan P; George AT; Kirubakaran R; Barnabas JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 22459428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
    Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.