BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20430578)

  • 1. Logistic regression was preferred to estimate risk differences and numbers needed to be exposed adjusted for covariates.
    Gehrmann U; Kuss O; Wellmann J; Bender R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1223-31. PubMed ID: 20430578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis.
    Bender R; Kuss O; Hildebrandt M; Gehrmann U
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5586-95. PubMed ID: 17879268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating adjusted NNTs in randomised controlled trials with binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Bender R; Vervölgyi V
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 20624484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correction of confounding bias in non-randomized studies by appropriate weighting.
    Schmoor C; Gall C; Stampf S; Graf E
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):369-87. PubMed ID: 21308726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models.
    Gregory M; Ulmer H; Pfeiffer KP; Lang S; Strasak AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18603325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias of estimates of the number needed to treat.
    Duncan BW; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1837-48. PubMed ID: 15806616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inference using conditional logistic regression with missing covariates.
    Lipsitz SR; Parzen M; Ewell M
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):295-303. PubMed ID: 9544523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of risks by predicting counterfactuals.
    Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3761-81. PubMed ID: 19856279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absolute risk reductions, relative risks, relative risk reductions, and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from a logistic regression model.
    Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 19230611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Cox's model and logistic regression for matched case-control data with time-dependent covariates: a simulation study.
    Leffondré K; Abrahamowicz M; Siemiatycki J
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3781-94. PubMed ID: 14673938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating predictive values for blood pressure measurements from multivariate regression models with covariates.
    Cook NR
    Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(19):2013-28. PubMed ID: 8896136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.
    Jiang H; Symanowski J; Paul S; Qu Y; Zagar A; Hong S
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5850-60. PubMed ID: 18759373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculating the "number needed to be exposed" with adjustment for confounding variables in epidemiological studies.
    Bender R; Blettner M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2002 May; 55(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 12007557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
    Laubender RP; Bender R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting treatment-effect estimates with heterogeneity and choice: simulation model results.
    Brooks JM; Fang G
    Clin Ther; 2009 Apr; 31(4):902-19. PubMed ID: 19446162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
    Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three methods to construct predictive models using logistic regression and likelihood ratios to facilitate adjustment for pretest probability give similar results.
    Chan SF; Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 18083462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.