These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20433291)

  • 1. Comparison of patient and surgeon ratings of outcome 12 months after spine surgery: presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting.
    Porchet F; Lattig F; Grob D; Kleinstueck FS; Jeszenszky D; Paus C; O'Riordan D; Mannion AF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 May; 12(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 20433291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree?
    Lattig F; Grob D; Kleinstueck FS; Porchet F; Jeszenszky D; Bartanusz V; O'Riordan D; Mannion AF
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):386-94. PubMed ID: 19462185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between patient and surgeon perception of degenerative spine disease outcomes--a prospective blinded database study.
    Roitberg BZ; Thaci B; Auffinger B; Kaplan L; Shen J; Brown FD; Lam S
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 May; 155(5):757-64. PubMed ID: 23468038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of outcome in patients undergoing surgery for intradural spinal tumor using the multidimensional patient-rated Core Outcome Measures Index and the modified McCormick Scale.
    Bellut D; Burkhardt JK; Mannion AF; Porchet F
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E2. PubMed ID: 26235018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of obesity on surgeon ratings and patient-reported outcome measures after degenerative cervical spine disease surgery.
    Auffinger B; Lam S; Kraninger J; Shen J; Roitberg BZ
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):e345-52. PubMed ID: 24145235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of patient and surgeon preoperative expectations of spinal surgery.
    Lattig F; Fekete TF; OʼRiordan D; Kleinstück FS; Jeszenszky D; Porchet F; Mutter U; Mannion AF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):1040-8. PubMed ID: 22825477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.
    Mannion AF; Porchet F; Kleinstück FS; Lattig F; Jeszenszky D; Bartanusz V; Dvorak J; Grob D
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):374-9. PubMed ID: 19296136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of patient and surgeon satisfaction after orthopaedic trauma.
    Harris IA; Dao AT; Young JM; Solomon MJ; Jalaludin BB
    Injury; 2009 Apr; 40(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 19041968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The assessment of complications after spine surgery: time for a paradigm shift?
    Mannion AF; Fekete TF; O'Riordan D; Porchet F; Mutter UM; Jeszenszky D; Lattig F; Grob D; Kleinstueck FS
    Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 23523445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The bothersomeness of patient self-rated "complications" reported 1 year after spine surgery.
    Mannion AF; Mutter UM; Fekete FT; O'Riordan D; Jeszenszky D; Kleinstueck FS; Lattig F; Grob D; Porchet F
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1625-32. PubMed ID: 22481548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
    Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Could less be more when assessing patient-rated outcome in spinal stenosis?
    Mannion AF; Fekete TF; Wertli MM; Mattle M; Nauer S; Kleinstück FS; Jeszenszky D; Haschtmann D; Becker HJ; Porchet F;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):710-8. PubMed ID: 25955088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring surgical outcomes in subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease patients: minimum clinically important difference as a tool for determining meaningful clinical improvement.
    Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Roitberg BZ
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Feb; 74(2):206-13; discussion 213-4. PubMed ID: 24220005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications in spinal surgery: comparative survey of spine surgeons and patients who underwent spinal surgery.
    Ratliff JK; Lebude B; Albert T; Anene-Maidoh T; Anderson G; Dagostino P; Maltenfort M; Hilibrand A; Sharan A; Vaccaro AR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jun; 10(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 19558291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery.
    Pochon L; Kleinstück FS; Porchet F; Mannion AF
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jan; 25(1):235-246. PubMed ID: 26143123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.
    Mannion AF; Porchet F; Kleinstück FS; Lattig F; Jeszenszky D; Bartanusz V; Dvorak J; Grob D
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):367-73. PubMed ID: 19319578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.