These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20434023)

  • 1. User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews.
    Rosenbaum SE; Glenton C; Nylund HK; Oxman AD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):607-19. PubMed ID: 20434023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information.
    Rosenbaum SE; Glenton C; Oxman AD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 20434024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews.
    Langendam MW; Akl EA; Dahm P; Glasziou P; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():81. PubMed ID: 24059250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between the standard and a new alternative format of the Summary-of-Findings tables in Cochrane review users: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Santesso N; Neumann I; Mustafa RA; Mbuagbaw L; Ikobaltzeta IE; De Stio C; McCullagh LJ; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Vandvik PO; Brozek JL; Akl EA; Bossuyt P; Churchill R; Glenton C; Rosenbaum S; Tugwell P; Welch V; Guyatt G; Schünemann H
    Trials; 2015 Apr; 16():164. PubMed ID: 25873338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
    Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Morgan RL; Mbuagbaw L; Carrasco-Labra A; Chang S; Hempel S; Shekelle P; Helfand M; Baldeh T; Schünemann HJ
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e015623. PubMed ID: 29362242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the summary of findings table for network meta-analysis.
    Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Li SA; Guyatt G; Jack SM; Brozek JL; Beyene J; Murad MH; Rochwerg B; Mbuagbaw L; Zhang Y; Flórez ID; Siemieniuk RA; Sadeghirad B; Mustafa R; Santesso N; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():1-13. PubMed ID: 31055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facilitating evidence uptake: development and user testing of a systematic review summary format to inform public health decision-making in German-speaking countries.
    Busert LK; Mütsch M; Kien C; Flatz A; Griebler U; Wildner M; Stratil JM; Rehfuess EA;
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):59. PubMed ID: 29986706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format.
    Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Santesso N; Neumann I; Mustafa RA; Mbuagbaw L; Etxeandia Ikobaltzeta I; De Stio C; McCullagh LJ; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Vandvik PO; Brozek JL; Akl EA; Bossuyt P; Churchill R; Glenton C; Rosenbaum S; Tugwell P; Welch V; Garner P; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():7-18. PubMed ID: 26791430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GRADE summary of findings tables enhanced understanding of values and preferences evidence.
    Zhang Y; Li SA; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Morgan RL; Pardo-Hernandez H; Alonso Coello P; Ren M; Mirza RD; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jul; 147():60-68. PubMed ID: 35364232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. User testing of an adaptation of fishbone diagrams to depict results of systematic reviews.
    Gartlehner G; Schultes MT; Titscher V; Morgan LC; Bobashev GV; Williams P; West SL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 29233133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User experiences of evidence-based online resources for health professionals: user testing of The Cochrane Library.
    Rosenbaum SE; Glenton C; Cracknell J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jul; 8():34. PubMed ID: 18662382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation evidence tables part 4: a three-arm noninferiority randomized trial demonstrates improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format.
    Morgan RL; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Ewusie J; Mbuagbaw L; Chang S; Baldeh T; Hempel S; Helfand M; Shekelle P; Wilt TJ; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 154():125-135. PubMed ID: 36503004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Russian translations for Cochrane.
    Yudina EV; Ziganshina LE
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S112-3. PubMed ID: 26639688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A summary to communicate evidence from systematic reviews to the public improved understanding and accessibility of information: a randomized controlled trial.
    Santesso N; Rader T; Nilsen ES; Glenton C; Rosenbaum S; Ciapponi A; Moja L; Pardo JP; Zhou Q; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 25034199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative.
    Glenton C; Underland V; Kho M; Pennick V; Oxman AD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 16828668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews on child welfare services: identifying and disseminating the evidence.
    Kornør H; Bergman H; Maayan N; Soares-Weiser K; Bjørndal A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Oct; 21(5):855-60. PubMed ID: 26081348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological review showed correct absolute effect size estimates for time-to-event outcomes in less than one-third of cancer-related systematic reviews.
    Skoetz N; Goldkuhle M; Weigl A; Dwan K; Labonté V; Dahm P; Meerpohl JJ; Djulbegovic B; van Dalen EC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():1-9. PubMed ID: 30543910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice.
    Smith E; Ross F; Donovan S; Manthorpe J; Brearley S; Sitzia J; Beresford P
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Feb; 45(2):298-315. PubMed ID: 17161402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence flowers: An innovative, visual method of presenting "best evidence" summaries to health professional and lay audiences.
    Babatunde OO; Tan V; Jordan JL; Dziedzic K; Chew-Graham CA; Jinks C; Protheroe J; van der Windt DA
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):273-284. PubMed ID: 29439286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update of strategies to translate evidence from cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews for use by various audiences.
    Rader T; Pardo Pardo J; Stacey D; Ghogomu E; Maxwell LJ; Welch VA; Singh JA; Buchbinder R; Légaré F; Santesso N; Toupin April K; O'Connor AM; Wells GA; Winzenberg TM; Johnston R; Tugwell P;
    J Rheumatol; 2014 Feb; 41(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 24293571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.