These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20434469)

  • 21. Temporal characteristics of working memory for spatial relations: an ERP study.
    van der Ham IJ; van Strien JW; Oleksiak A; van Wezel RJ; Postma A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Aug; 77(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 20462512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of stimulus factors in making categorical and coordinate spatial judgments.
    Wilkinson D; Donnelly N
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Apr; 39(3):171-85. PubMed ID: 10101039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 11970792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions.
    Gevers W; Santens S; Dhooge E; Chen Q; Van den Bossche L; Fias W; Verguts T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Feb; 139(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 20121318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing: more on contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system.
    Hellige JB; Cumberland N
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Mar; 45(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 11237364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
    Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The study of hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations in animals.
    Vauclair J; Yamazaki Y; Güntürkün O
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16516247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hemispheric contribution to categorical and coordinate representational processes: a study on brain-damaged patients.
    Palermo L; Bureca I; Matano A; Guariglia C
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2802-7. PubMed ID: 18614187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of attentional scope on spatial relation processing: a case study.
    van der Ham IJ; Dijkerman HC; van den Berg E
    Neurocase; 2013; 19(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 22853631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations during an image generation task: evidence from children and adults.
    Reese CJ; Stiles J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 15716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS.
    Trojano L; Conson M; Maffei R; Grossi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1569-74. PubMed ID: 16529780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distinct neural networks underlie encoding of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations during active navigation.
    Baumann O; Chan E; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1630-7. PubMed ID: 22300811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemispheric lateralization in top-down attention during spatial relation processing: a Granger causal model approach.
    Falasca NW; D'Ascenzo S; Di Domenico A; Onofrj M; Tommasi L; Laeng B; Franciotti R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 41(7):914-24. PubMed ID: 25704649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The neural basis for spatial relations.
    Amorapanth PX; Widick P; Chatterjee A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1739-53. PubMed ID: 19642889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in vision and visual imagery.
    Michimata C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Apr; 33(3):370-87. PubMed ID: 9126401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Looking left with left neglect: the role of spatial attention when active vision selects local image features for fixation.
    Ptak R; Golay L; Müri RM; Schnider A
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19038381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dissociation between categorical and coordinate spatial computations: modulation by cerebral hemispheres, task properties, mode of response, and age.
    Bruyer R; Scailquin JC; Coibion P
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Apr; 33(3):245-77. PubMed ID: 9126395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.