174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20434615)
21. Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair.
Cooper RA; Fitzgerald SG; Boninger ML; Prins K; Rentschler AJ; Arva J; O'connor TJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 May; 82(5):702-8. PubMed ID: 11346854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of wheelchair acquisition on social participation.
Rousseau-Harrison K; Rochette A; Routhier F; Dessureault D; Thibault F; Côté O
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Sep; 4(5):344-52. PubMed ID: 19565375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: an important element in the rehabilitation process.
samuelsson K; Wressle E
Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(7):551-8. PubMed ID: 17852301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tobacco use and recovery of gait and balance function in older adults.
Bishop MD; Robinson ME; Light KE
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 90(9):1613-8. PubMed ID: 19735791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinimetric evaluation of the physical mobility scale supports clinicians and researchers in residential aged care.
Barker AL; Nitz JC; Low Choy NL; Haines TP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 89(11):2140-5. PubMed ID: 18996243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use.
Löfqvist C; Pettersson C; Iwarsson S; Brandt A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 May; 7(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 21980966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users.
Edwards K; McCluskey A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2010; 5(6):411-9. PubMed ID: 20450455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability, convergent validity and applicability of the Assistive Technology Outcome Profile for Mobility for middle-aged and older power wheelchair users.
Auger C; Rushton PW; Jutai JW; Miller WC
Aust Occup Ther J; 2018 Oct; 65(5):439-448. PubMed ID: 30178483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prevalence and predictors of need for seating intervention and mobility for persons in long-term care.
Bourbonniere MC; Fawcett LM; Miller WC; Garden J; Mortenson WB
Can J Aging; 2007; 26(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 18238726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A follow-up study of older adults with traumatic brain injury: taking into account decreasing length of stay.
Frankel JE; Marwitz JH; Cifu DX; Kreutzer JS; Englander J; Rosenthal M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 16401439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of a Simplified Tai-Chi Exercise Program (STEP) on the physical health of older adults living in long-term care facilities: a single group design with multiple time points.
Chen KM; Lin JN; Lin HS; Wu HC; Chen WT; Li CH; Kai Lo S
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Apr; 45(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 17222413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictive validity of the classification schema for functional mobility tests in instrumental activities of daily living decline among older adults.
Shimada H; Sawyer P; Harada K; Kaneya S; Nihei K; Asakawa Y; Yoshii C; Hagiwara A; Furuna T; Ishizaki T
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 91(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 20159128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability and validity of the telephone administration of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) for middle-aged and older users of power mobility devices.
Auger C; Demers L; Gélinas I; Routhier F; Mortenson WB; Miller WC
J Rehabil Med; 2010 Jun; 42(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 20549163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Telerehabilitation wheeled mobility and seating assessments compared with in person.
Schein RM; Schmeler MR; Holm MB; Saptono A; Brienza DM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 20510977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does functionally based activity make a difference to health status and mobility? A randomised controlled trial in residential care facilities (The Promoting Independent Living Study; PILS).
Peri K; Kerse N; Robinson E; Parsons M; Parsons J; Latham N
Age Ageing; 2008 Jan; 37(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17965045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors associated with life space among community-living rural elders in Japan.
Murata C; Kondo T; Tamakoshi K; Yatsuya H; Toyoshima H
Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 16817803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Powered mobility device use in residential aged care: a retrospective audit of incidents and injuries.
Dickson NC; Gohil AR; Unsworth CA
BMC Geriatr; 2023 Jun; 23(1):363. PubMed ID: 37301972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of powered scooters on activity, participation and quality of life in elderly users.
Pettersson I; Hagberg L; Fredriksson C; Hermansson LN
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Oct; 11(7):558-63. PubMed ID: 25799878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Men's and women's perspectives on using a powered mobility device: benefits and societal challenges.
Pettersson C; Iwarsson S; Brandt A; Norin L; Månsson Lexell E
Scand J Occup Ther; 2014 Nov; 21(6):438-46. PubMed ID: 24784724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Homebound status and life space among Japanese community-dwelling elderly in an urban area].
Murayama H; Shibui Y; Kawashima T; Kano N; Toratani A; Tachibana R; Shibuta K; Fukuda Y; Murashima S
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2011 Oct; 58(10):851-66. PubMed ID: 22351999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]