206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20435062)
1. Repeated measurement of the components of attention using two versions of the Attention Network Test (ANT): stability, isolability, robustness, and reliability.
Ishigami Y; Klein RM
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jun; 190(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 20435062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeated measurement of the attention components of patients with multiple sclerosis using the Attention Network Test-Interaction (ANT-I): stability, isolability, robustness, and reliability.
Ishigami Y; Fisk JD; Wojtowicz M; Klein RM
J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23473799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeated Measurement of the Components of Attention of Older Adults using the Two Versions of the Attention Network Test: Stability, Isolability, Robustness, and Reliability.
Ishigami Y; Klein RM
Front Aging Neurosci; 2011; 3():17. PubMed ID: 22110440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study.
Hietanen JK; Nummenmaa L; Nyman MJ; Parkkola R; Hämäläinen H
Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):406-13. PubMed ID: 16949306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixing measures: testing an assumption of the Attention Network Test.
McConnell MM; Shore DI
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1096-107. PubMed ID: 21264741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
Ngo MK; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks.
Fan J; McCandliss BD; Sommer T; Raz A; Posner MI
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Apr; 14(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 11970796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The activation of attentional networks.
Fan J; McCandliss BD; Fossella J; Flombaum JI; Posner MI
Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 15907304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the Attention Network Test.
Macleod JW; Lawrence MA; McConnell MM; Eskes GA; Klein RM; Shore DI
Neuropsychology; 2010 Sep; 24(5):637-51. PubMed ID: 20804252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal and impaired reflexive orienting of attention after central nonpredictive cues.
Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Zorzi M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):745-59. PubMed ID: 18578597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention Network Test reveals alerting network dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.
Urbanek C; Weinges-Evers N; Bellmann-Strobl J; Bock M; Dörr J; Hahn E; Neuhaus AH; Opgen-Rhein C; Ta TM; Herges K; Pfueller CF; Radbruch H; Wernecke KD; Ohlraun S; Zipp F; Dettling M; Paul F
Mult Scler; 2010 Jan; 16(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 19995842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
