These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2043560)

  • 1. Modification, calibration, and comparative testing of an automated surgical keratometer.
    Simon G; Parel JM; Nose I; Lee W
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 2043560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-assisted corneal topography: accuracy and reproducibility of the topographic modeling system.
    Legeais JM; Ren Q; Simon G; Parel JM
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 8241039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraoperative PAR corneal topography system (CTS): comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, EyeSys Corneal Analysis system, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes.
    Uçakhan OO; Sternberg G; Bodian C; Kelliher K; Asbell PA
    CLAO J; 2000 Jul; 26(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 10946987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optics of the corneal epithelium.
    Simon G; Ren Q; Kervick GN; Parel JM
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 8481372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical trial of the SUN SK-2000 computer-assisted videokeratoscope.
    Dave TN; Fowler CW; Elawad ME; Dunne MC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Mar; 15(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 7659406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Pitfalls of IOL power prediction after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia -- case report, practical recommendations and literature review].
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Haigis W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Dec; 219(12):840-50. PubMed ID: 12548468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topography-guided customized laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the treatment of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.
    Rajan MS; O'Brart DP; Patel P; Falcon MG; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jun; 32(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 16814052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the Hyde surgical astigmatic ruler.
    House PH; Chauhan BC
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1988 Aug; 19(8):554-8. PubMed ID: 3173975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Optical power of the corneal epithelium].
    Simon G; Legeais JM; Parel JM
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1993; 16(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 8482799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I.
    Koch DD; Wakil JS; Samuelson SW; Haft EA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1992 Jul; 18(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 1501084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Higher-order aberrations in eyes with irregular corneas after laser refractive surgery.
    McCormick GJ; Porter J; Cox IG; MacRae S
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1699-709. PubMed ID: 16095700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Nguyen NX; Kus MM; Küchle M
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 10201589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disparity between keratometry-style readings and corneal power within the pupil after refractive surgery for myopia.
    Maeda N; Klyce SD; Smolek MK; McDonald MB
    Cornea; 1997 Sep; 16(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 9294681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of the optical micrometer, the coin gauge, and the diamond knife micrometer in diamond knife calibration.
    Au YK; Reynolds MD; Chadalavada RC
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(4):299-302. PubMed ID: 1911511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Measurement of the radius of corneal curvature with the Maloney surgical keratometer and an on-line keratometer imagery processing system].
    Igarashi S; Yoshida A; Igarashi H; Kojima M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jan; 97(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 8434540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two semi-quantitative surgical keratometers: the modified Hyde ruler and the Barrett keratoscope with "astigmatic dial".
    Morlet N; Lindsay P; Cooke P
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1994 Mar; 25(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8196916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Hirschberg test: correlation with corneal radius and axial length.
    Eskridge JB; Perrigin DM; Leach NE
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Apr; 67(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 2342785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in keratometric corneal power and refractive error after laser thermal keratoplasty.
    Park CY; Ji YH; Chung ES
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):867-72. PubMed ID: 15093653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consideration of the posterior corneal curvature for assessment of corneal power after myopic LASIK.
    Langenbucher A; Torres F; Behrens A; Suarez E; Haigis W; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):264-9. PubMed ID: 15115446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A fully automated calibration method for an optical see-through head-mounted operating microscope with variable zoom and focus.
    Figl M; Ede C; Hummel J; Wanschitz F; Ewers R; Bergmann H; Birkfellner W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Nov; 24(11):1492-9. PubMed ID: 16279085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.