These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20436195)

  • 21. The effects of interletter spacing in visual-word recognition.
    Perea M; Moret-Tatay C; Gómez P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 21545978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Basic processes in reading aloud and colour naming: towards a better understanding of the role of spatial attention.
    Robidoux S; Rauwerda D; Besner D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 May; 67(5):979-90. PubMed ID: 24224499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):954-9. PubMed ID: 16262491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm.
    Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 17469972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When do microsaccades follow spatial attention?
    Laubrock J; Kliegl R; Rolfs M; Engbert R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):683-94. PubMed ID: 20348575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. It's what's on the outside that matters: an advantage for external features in children's word recognition.
    Webb TM; Beech JR; Mayall KM; Andrews AS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jun; 94(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16530781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attention modulates initial stages of visual word processing.
    Ruz M; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 20(9):1727-36. PubMed ID: 18345981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Focused spatial attention is independent of rapid resumption of an interrupted search.
    Lleras A; Enns JT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):565-77. PubMed ID: 19304647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Solving the chicken-and-egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading.
    Roy-Charland A; Saint-Aubin J; Lawrence MA; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19801615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of interword spacing in reading Japanese: an eye movement study.
    Sainio M; Hyönä J; Bingushi K; Bertram R
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(20):2575-84. PubMed ID: 17697693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: testing a two-process model.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):342-52. PubMed ID: 20139450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implied body action directs spatial attention.
    Gervais WM; Reed CL; Beall PM; Roberts RJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1437-43. PubMed ID: 20675790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spatial attention and audiovisual interactions in apparent motion.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):927-37. PubMed ID: 17683238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.