These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20436195)

  • 41. Semantic processing is affected in inhibition of return: evidence from an event-related potentials study.
    Zhang M; Zhang Y
    Neuroreport; 2007 Feb; 18(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 17314669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Exterior letters are not privileged in the early stage of visual word recognition during reading: comment on Jordan, Thomas, Patching and Scott-Brown (2003).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Skelly M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):894-9. PubMed ID: 14516222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
    Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The interplay of spatial attention and memory: evidence for memory-driven spatial compatibility effects, but not for a facilitating role of attention in memory retrieval.
    Vankov I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2124-9. PubMed ID: 21671154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. When cross-modal spatial attention fails.
    Prime DJ; McDonald JJ; Green J; Ward LM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 18778148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Going rogue in the spatial cuing paradigm: high spatial validity is insufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention.
    Davis GJ; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1192-201. PubMed ID: 22390290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. On the strength of connections between localist mental modules as a source of frequency-of-occurrence effects.
    Besner D; Moroz S; O'Malley S
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 21285440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The relationship between alertness and executive control.
    Weinbach N; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1530-40. PubMed ID: 22468726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to early processes in reading.
    Besner D; Risko EF; Sklair N
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 16035344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):138-47. PubMed ID: 21288259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Visual attention and the semantics of space: beyond central and peripheral cues.
    Gibson BS; Kingstone A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jul; 17(7):622-7. PubMed ID: 16866749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Visual word recognition: reattending to the role of spatial attention.
    Stolz JA; McCann RS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1320-31. PubMed ID: 10946717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Default spacing is the optimal spacing for word reading.
    van den Boer M; Hakvoort BE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):697-709. PubMed ID: 25210997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Interword spacing in Chinese text layout.
    Hsu SH; Huang KC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):355-65. PubMed ID: 11065294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?
    Brown TL; Gore CL; Carr TH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):220-40. PubMed ID: 12049241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks.
    Robidoux S; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1709-16. PubMed ID: 25862427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Combined perceptual or motor-related expectancies modulated by type of cue.
    Mattler U
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):649-66. PubMed ID: 12812285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The impact of letter spacing on reading: a test of the bigram coding hypothesis.
    Vinckier F; Qiao E; Pallier C; Dehaene S; Cohen L
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):1-21. PubMed ID: 21566152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.
    Bugg JM; McDaniel MA; Scullin MK; Braver TS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1595-606. PubMed ID: 21767049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.