189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20436697)
1. Authorship policy of the Journal of Korean Medical Science.
Hong ST
J Korean Med Sci; 2010 May; 25(5):657. PubMed ID: 20436697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors.
Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J
Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to write a medical paper to get it published in a good journal.
Lundberg GD
MedGenMed; 2005 Nov; 7(4):36. PubMed ID: 16614658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality articles require peer reviewers as well as authors.
Mack A
J Manag Care Pharm; 2005 Mar; 11(2):186. PubMed ID: 15766327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New information for authors and readers. Group authorship, acknowledgements, and rejected manuscripts.
Glass RM
JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(1):99. PubMed ID: 1482435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Editor's nitpicking.
Castillo M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 Sep; 31(8):1353-4. PubMed ID: 20203110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidelines for writing journal articles in English.
Suh MH
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2004 Jun; 34(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 15502425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals.
Khan MS; Shaikh A; Ochani RK; Akhtar T; Fatima K; Khan SU; Mookadam F; Murad MH; Figueredo VM; Doukky R; Krasuski RA
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 May; 12(5):e005260. PubMed ID: 31030545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Clarke SP
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ghost busting-taking the sheet off the ghost.
Moots RJ; Wilson K; Silverman ED;
Rheumatol Int; 2016 Apr; 36(4):455-6. PubMed ID: 26910790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why and how to avoid a desk-rejection.
Lake ET
Res Nurs Health; 2020 Apr; 43(2):141-142. PubMed ID: 32103510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific writing: the process and the pitfalls.
Byard RW
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):285-6. PubMed ID: 23832426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Footnotes, acknowledgments, and authorship: toward greater responsibility, accountability, and transparency.
Liesegang TJ; Bartley GB
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 158(6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 25457700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A snapshot into reviewer's work; what is the best way to credit them?
Kumar S; Millar H; Blee I
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2021 Apr; 46(3):548-549. PubMed ID: 32681653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
Kennedy MS
Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
