These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63. Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition. Craddock M; Lawson R PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e8009. PubMed ID: 19956685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing. Volcic R; van Rheede JJ; Postma A; Kappers AM Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 18553074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Response Modality vs. Target Modality: Sensory Transformations and Comparisons in Cross-modal Slant Matching Tasks. Liu J; Ando H Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11068. PubMed ID: 30038316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Developing a memory representation: Do we visualize or do we "verbalize" objects? Desmarais G; Penrose C Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 32250130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Ambient visual information confers a context-specific, long-term benefit on memory for haptic scenes. Pasqualotto A; Finucane CM; Newell FN Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):363-79. PubMed ID: 23764999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes. Cattaneo Z; Vecchi T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):631-42. PubMed ID: 18444761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Examining the size-weight illusion with visuo-haptic conflict in immersive virtual reality. Buckingham G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2168-2175. PubMed ID: 30789088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Wraga M; Creem SH; Proffitt DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):151-68. PubMed ID: 10682295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Seeing and feeling for self and other: proprioceptive spatial location determines multisensory enhancement of touch. Cardini F; Haggard P; Ladavas E Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23376293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Exploration mode affects visuohaptic integration of surface orientation. Plaisier MA; van Dam LC; Glowania C; Ernst MO J Vis; 2014 Nov; 14(13):22. PubMed ID: 25413627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The speed of object recognition from a haptic glance: event-related potential evidence. Gurtubay-Antolin A; Rodriguez-Herreros B; RodrĂguez-Fornells A J Neurophysiol; 2015 May; 113(9):3069-75. PubMed ID: 25744887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. Bushnell EW; Baxt C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1867-81. PubMed ID: 10641320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Gaze direction influences grasping actions towards unseen, haptically explored, objects. Pirruccio M; Monaco S; Della Libera C; Cattaneo L Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15774. PubMed ID: 32978418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Perceptual equivalence between vision and touch is complexity dependent. Phillips F; Egan EJ; Perry BN Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 19691944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Mental object rotation and the planning of hand movements. Wohlschläger A Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):709-18. PubMed ID: 11436739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Visual delay affects force scaling and weight perception during object lifting in virtual reality. van Polanen V; Tibold R; Nuruki A; Davare M J Neurophysiol; 2019 Apr; 121(4):1398-1409. PubMed ID: 30673365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Two hands, one perception: how bimanual haptic information is combined by the brain. Squeri V; Sciutti A; Gori M; Masia L; Sandini G; Konczak J J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jan; 107(2):544-50. PubMed ID: 22031771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]