BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20438146)

  • 1. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
    McGrath RE; Mitchell M; Kim BH; Hough L
    Psychol Bull; 2010 May; 136(3):450-70. PubMed ID: 20438146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A misleading review of response bias: comment on McGrath, Mitchell, Kim, and Hough (2010).
    Rohling ML; Larrabee GJ; Greiffenstein MF; Ben-Porath YS; Lees-Haley P; Green P; Greve KW
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):708-12; authors reply 713-5. PubMed ID: 21707131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.
    Hunsley J; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 14692841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further validation of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF Response Bias Scale: findings from disability and criminal forensic settings.
    Wygant DB; Sellbom M; Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Stafford KP; Freeman DB; Heilbronner RL
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Dec; 22(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 20919770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2.
    Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Wygant DB; Green P
    Assessment; 2007 Jun; 14(2):196-208. PubMed ID: 17504891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance.
    Lubke GH; Dolan CV; Kelderman H; Mellenbergh GJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):231-48. PubMed ID: 14633334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An examination of psychometric bias due to retesting on cognitive ability tests in selection settings.
    Lievens F; Reeve CL; Heggestad ED
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1672-82. PubMed ID: 18020804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On mean-sigma estimators and bias.
    Baldwin P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 22571589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation.
    Ardolf BR; Denney RL; Houston CM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):899-916. PubMed ID: 17886149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential sensitivity of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and MMPI-2 validity scales to memory complaints.
    Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Wygant DB; Green P
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1061-79. PubMed ID: 18609315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a process-focused model of test score validity: improving psychological assessment in science and practice.
    Bornstein RF
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Jun; 23(2):532-44. PubMed ID: 21668126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incremental validity in the psychological assessment of children and adolescents.
    Johnston C; Murray C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):496-507. PubMed ID: 14692845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The psychometricians' fallacy: too clever by half?
    Michell J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):41-55. PubMed ID: 17908369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift.
    Oort FJ; Visser MR; Sprangers MA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1126-37. PubMed ID: 19540722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rasch techniques for detecting bias in performance assessments: an example comparing the performance of native and non-native speakers on a test of academic English.
    Elder C; McNamara T; Congdon P
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 12748409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias in uncontrolled therapeutic trials in rheumatology due to selection of populations with extreme characteristics.
    Ioannidis JP; Karassa FB
    J Rheumatol; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1881-7. PubMed ID: 11508595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of failure on cognitive and psychological symptom validity tests in litigants with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.
    Demakis GJ; Gervais RO; Rohling ML
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 22(5):879-95. PubMed ID: 18756390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.
    Malaty HM; Abudayyeh S; O'Malley KJ; Wilsey MJ; Fraley K; Gilger MA; Hollier D; Graham DY; Rabeneck L
    Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e210-5. PubMed ID: 15687428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.
    Ruscio J; Walters GD; Marcus DK; Kaczetow W
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 20230147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.