These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20438146)

  • 41. Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: findings from simulation and known group samples.
    Wygant DB; Ben-Porath YS; Arbisi PA; Berry DT; Freeman DB; Heilbronner RL
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 24(7):671-80. PubMed ID: 19797242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bias in consensus scoring, with examples from ability emotional intelligence tests.
    Barchard KA; Russell JA
    Psicothema; 2006; 18 Suppl():49-54. PubMed ID: 17295957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Relationship between Tomm performance and PAI validity scales in a mixed clinical sample.
    Whiteside DM; Dunbar-Mayer P; Waters DP
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Apr; 23(3):523-33. PubMed ID: 18821137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluating bias in validity studies of developmental/behavioral screening tests.
    Camp BW
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2007 Jun; 28(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 17565292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What is being assessed and why it matters: the impact of transient error on trait research.
    Chmielewski M; Watson D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jul; 97(1):186-202. PubMed ID: 19586248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acquiescence as a source of bias and model and person misfit: a theoretical and empirical analysis.
    Ferrando PJ; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):427-48. PubMed ID: 19840493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A method for testing group differences of scale validity in multiple population studies.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):173-84. PubMed ID: 15969845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis.
    Slaney KL; Maraun MD
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):376-90. PubMed ID: 19072000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales.
    Morey LC; Quigley BD; Sanislow CA; Skodol AE; McGlashan TH; Shea MT; Stout RL; Zanarini MC; Gunderson JG
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Dec; 79(3):583-99. PubMed ID: 12511022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: evidence from meta-analysis.
    Wilson DB; Lipsey MW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):413-29. PubMed ID: 11778681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sensitivity and specificity of a digit symbol recognition trial in the identification of response bias.
    Kim N; Boone KB; Victor T; Lu P; Keatinge C; Mitchell C
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Aug; 25(5):420-8. PubMed ID: 20562116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Validity indicators within the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: application of new and previously researched multivariate procedures in multiple traumatic brain injury samples.
    King JH; Sweet JJ; Sherer M; Curtiss G; Vanderploeg RD
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 16(4):506-23. PubMed ID: 12822059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Controlling decremental and inflationary effects in reliability estimation resulting from violations of assumptions.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):403-24. PubMed ID: 11783569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Multiple trials may yield exaggerated effect size estimates.
    Brand A; Bradley MT; Best LA; Stoica G
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21404946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. First record: a methodological approach to counter sampling bias.
    Johnson LC; Beaton R; Murphy SA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Oct; 95(2):391-2. PubMed ID: 15587198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The relationship between mean square differences and standard error of measurement: comment on Barchard (2012).
    Pan T; Yin Y
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):309-11. PubMed ID: 22663013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.
    McClelland GH; Judd CM
    Psychol Bull; 1993 Sep; 114(2):376-90. PubMed ID: 8416037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Arbitrary metrics in psychology.
    Blanton H; Jaccard J
    Am Psychol; 2006 Jan; 61(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 16435974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Revisiting Case IV: a reassessment of bias and standard errors of Case IV under range restriction.
    Fife DA; Mendoza JL; Terry R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):521-42. PubMed ID: 23046339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.