These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20438254)

  • 1. The costs of supervised classification: The effect of learning task on conceptual flexibility.
    Hoffman AB; Rehder B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):319-40. PubMed ID: 20438254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More than one kind of inference: re-examining what's learned in feature inference and classification.
    Sweller N; Hayes BK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1568-89. PubMed ID: 20373228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classifying partial exemplars: seeing less and learning more.
    Taylor EG; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1374-80. PubMed ID: 19686031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus control by same-versus-different relations among multiple visual stimuli.
    Wasserman EA; Frank AJ; Young ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 12395492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
    Livingston KR; Andrews JK
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize.
    Horst JS; Oakes LM; Madole KL
    Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):614-31. PubMed ID: 15892782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced discrimination of novel, highly similar stimuli by adults with autism during a perceptual learning task.
    Plaisted K; O'Riordan M; Baron-Cohen S
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1998 Jul; 39(5):765-75. PubMed ID: 9690939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning and retention through predictive inference and classification.
    Sakamoto Y; Love BC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):361-77. PubMed ID: 21198253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semisupervised category learning: the impact of feedback in learning the information-integration task.
    Vandist K; De Schryver M; Rosseel Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):328-41. PubMed ID: 19304622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
    Makino H; Jitsumori M
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More learned irrelevance than perseveration errors in rule shifting in healthy subjects.
    Maes JH; Damen MD; Eling PA
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 15050775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorization and abstraction abilities in 3-year-old children: a comparison with monkey data.
    Bovet D; Vauclair J; Blaye A
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Jan; 8(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15300466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supervised versus unsupervised categorization: two sides of the same coin?
    Pothos EM; Edwards DJ; Perlman A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1692-713. PubMed ID: 21812708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Producing biased diagnoses with unambiguous stimuli: The importance of feature instantiations.
    Hannah SD; Brooks LR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1416-23. PubMed ID: 17087593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thinking graphically: Connecting vision and cognition during graph comprehension.
    Ratwani RM; Trafton JG; Boehm-Davis DA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 18377165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.