These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20438265)

  • 1. The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
    MacLeod CM; Gopie N; Hourihan KL; Neary KR; Ozubko JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):671-85. PubMed ID: 20438265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Directed forgetting meets the production effect: distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting.
    Hourihan KL; Macleod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 19071992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The production effect in memory: evidence that distinctiveness underlies the benefit.
    Ozubko JD; Macleod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1543-7. PubMed ID: 20804284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of study context on item recollection.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1318-34. PubMed ID: 19890765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the production effect in memory.
    Quinlan CK; Taylor TL
    Memory; 2013; 21(8):904-15. PubMed ID: 23384885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remembered study mode: support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect.
    Ozubko JD; Major J; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):509-24. PubMed ID: 23713784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs non-elaborative processing.
    Forrin ND; Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):470-80. PubMed ID: 23705973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False recognition following study of semantically related lists presented in jumbled word form.
    Halcomb SH; Taylor JP; DeSouza KD; Wallace WP
    Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 18432488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19857028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: new challenges.
    Besner D; O'Malley S; Robidoux S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):750-64. PubMed ID: 20438270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directed forgetting: Comparing pictures and words.
    Quinlan CK; Taylor TL; Fawcett JM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 20384417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aging and the production effect: a test of the distinctiveness account.
    Lin OY; MacLeod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 22686153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rehearsal strategies can enlarge or diminish the spacing effect: pure versus mixed lists and encoding strategy.
    Delaney PF; Verkoeijen PP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1148-61. PubMed ID: 19686011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When does generation enhance memory for location?
    Marsh EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1216-20. PubMed ID: 16938059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metacognition and false recognition in patients with frontal lobe lesions: the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Budson AE; Dodson CS; Vatner JM; Daffner KR; Black PM; Schacter DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):860-71. PubMed ID: 15716158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using maintenance rehearsal to explore recognition memory.
    Humphreys MS; Maguire AM; McFarlane KA; Burt JS; Bolland SW; Murray KL; Dunn R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 20053051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.
    Rastle K; Havelka J; Wydell TN; Coltheart M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19210093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.