142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20438312)
21. Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic management of ovarian cancer.
Jung US; Lee JH; Kyung MS; Choi JS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 19215557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome.
Kalogiannidis I; Lambrechts S; Amant F; Neven P; Van Gorp T; Vergote I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):248.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17346541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minilaparoscopic versus single-port total hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Gagliardi ML; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Gueli Alletti S; Vizzielli G; Ercoli A; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 23332717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in nonobese and obese women: A consecutive series.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Bergamini V; Uccella S; Beretta P; Franchi M; Bolis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 16825065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.
Park JH; Kim SY; Lee CR; Park S; Jeong JS; Kang SW; Jeong JJ; Nam KH; Chung WY; Park CS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2741-5. PubMed ID: 23494081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
Kim TJ; Lee YY; Kim MJ; Kim CJ; Kang H; Choi CH; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):612-5. PubMed ID: 19835804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Standardized technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer optimizes the perioperative outcomes.
Kavallaris A; Kalogiannidis I; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Bohlmann MK; Diedrich K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1373-80. PubMed ID: 20607263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer compared with laparotomy.
Terai Y; Tanaka T; Sasaki H; Kawaguchi H; Fujiwara S; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Kanemura M; Ohmichi M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Feb; 40(2):570-5. PubMed ID: 24118459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic limphadenectomy in obese women with stage I endometrial cancer.
Pellegrino A; Signorelli M; Fruscio R; Villa A; Buda A; Beretta P; Garbi A; Vitobello D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 May; 279(5):655-60. PubMed ID: 18795308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microlaparoscopy: a further development of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer staging -- initial experience.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Siesto G; Zefiro F; Franchi M; Bolis P
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 19243814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Low incidence of port-site metastases after laparoscopic staging of uterine cancer.
Martínez A; Querleu D; Leblanc E; Narducci F; Ferron G
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Aug; 118(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 20451983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach.
Byeon HK; Holsinger FC; Tufano RP; Chung HJ; Kim WS; Koh YW; Choi EC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Nov; 21(12):3872-5. PubMed ID: 25227305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival.
Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery.
Rossitto C; Cianci S; Gueli Alletti S; Perrone E; Pizzacalla S; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():125-129. PubMed ID: 28753500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Results of laparoscopic pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology patients in Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital.
Thavaramara T; Sheanakul C; Hanidhikul P; Ratchanon S; Wiriyasirivaj B; Leelahakorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):619-24. PubMed ID: 18672622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
