145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20438406)
1. Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (international society of urological pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point.
Delahunt B; Lamb DS; Srigley JR; Murray JD; Wilcox C; Samaratunga H; Atkinson C; Spry NA; Joseph D; Denham JW
Pathology; 2010 Jun; 42(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 20438406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Dong F; Wang C; Farris AB; Wu S; Lee H; Olumi AF; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 22592143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive and novel predictive modeling technique using detailed pathology factors in men with localized prostate carcinoma.
Potters L; Purrazzella R; Brustein S; Fearn P; Leibel SA; Kattan MW
Cancer; 2002 Oct; 95(7):1451-6. PubMed ID: 12237913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate-specific antigen velocity and prostate cancer gleason grade and stage.
Pinsky PF; Andriole G; Crawford ED; Chia D; Kramer BS; Grubb R; Greenlee R; Gohagan JK
Cancer; 2007 Apr; 109(8):1689-95. PubMed ID: 17330856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PSA nadir predicts biochemical and distant failures after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a multi-institutional analysis.
Ray ME; Thames HD; Levy LB; Horwitz EM; Kupelian PA; Martinez AA; Michalski JM; Pisansky TM; Shipley WU; Zelefsky MJ; Zietman AL; Kuban DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(4):1140-50. PubMed ID: 16198506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in Gleason scores for prostate cancer: what should we expect from a measurement?
Ramos J; Uchio E; Aslan M; Concato J
J Investig Med; 2010 Apr; 58(4):625-8. PubMed ID: 20224436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of reporting rules of biopsy Gleason score for prostate cancer.
Kuroiwa K; Uchino H; Yokomizo A; Naito S
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):260-3. PubMed ID: 18952690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].
Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative PSA is still predictive of cancer volume and grade in late PSA era.
Figler BD; Reuther AM; Dhar N; Levin H; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Klein EA
Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):711-6. PubMed ID: 17991542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
