241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2043853)
1. Persistent vegetative state and the right to die: the United States and Britain.
Jennett B; Dyer C
BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6787):1256-8. PubMed ID: 2043853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cruzan and the demands of due process.
Haddad ME
Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 1399496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
Albert LA
J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Essays in the aftermath of Cruzan.
White PD
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 1479306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical fallout from the Supreme Court decision on Nancy Cruzan: Chernobyl or Three Mile Island?
Pearlman RA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Jan; 39(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 1898957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Life, death, and the American College of Physicians: the Cruzan case.
Snyder L
Ann Intern Med; 1990 Jun; 112(11):802-4. PubMed ID: 2344110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cruzan: facing the inevitable.
Bopp J; Marzen TJ
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):37-51. PubMed ID: 1910130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.
Glover JJ
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 2110203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health.
Barton RS
Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 1903782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Living wills and the right to die.
Wallach SJ; Crabtree JP
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Dec; 49(12):461-4. PubMed ID: 2286520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The insane root takes reason prisoner: the supreme court and the right to die.
Annas GJ
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 8453236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to die as a case study in third-order decisionmaking.
Schauer F
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 1479307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case.
Obade CC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Lessons from Cruzan.
Meisel A
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 2132020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. From the Office of the General Counsel. The right to die after Cruzan.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1990 Nov; 264(18):2444-6. PubMed ID: 2232004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cruzan and the constitutionalization of American life.
Schneider CE
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):589-604. PubMed ID: 1479308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cruzan and caring for others.
Lynn J; Glover J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 2228576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.
Weir RF; Gostin L
JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
