These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20439258)

  • 1. Testing and interval estimation for two-sample survival comparisons with small sample sizes and unequal censoring.
    Wang R; Lagakos SW; Gray RJ
    Biostatistics; 2010 Oct; 11(4):676-92. PubMed ID: 20439258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact log-rank tests for unequal follow-up.
    Heinze G; Gnant M; Schemper M
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1151-7. PubMed ID: 14969496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations.
    Halabi S; Singh B
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size calculation for testing differences between cure rates with the optimal log-rank test.
    Wu J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(1):124-134. PubMed ID: 26882262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing methods for dealing with treatment switching in clinical trials: A follow-up simulation study.
    Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Morden JP; Crowther MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):765-784. PubMed ID: 27114326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonparametric comparison of two survival functions with dependent censoring via nonparametric multiple imputation.
    Hsu CH; Taylor JM
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):462-75. PubMed ID: 18991250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardized likelihood ratio test for comparing several log-normal means and confidence interval for the common mean.
    Krishnamoorthy K; Oral E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2919-2937. PubMed ID: 26614755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study to alternatives to the log-rank test.
    Dormuth I; Liu T; Xu J; Pauly M; Ditzhaus M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 May; 128():107165. PubMed ID: 36972865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression.
    Hertz-Picciotto I; Rockhill B
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1151-6. PubMed ID: 9333345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation and testing for clustered interval-censored bivariate survival data with application using the semi-parametric version of the Clayton-Oakes model.
    Rosner B; Bay C; Glynn RJ; Ying GS; Maguire MG; Lee MT
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2023 Oct; 29(4):854-887. PubMed ID: 36670299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interim monitoring using the adaptively weighted log-rank test in clinical trials for survival outcomes.
    Yang S
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(4):601-612. PubMed ID: 30209818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
    Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilizing the integrated difference of two survival functions to quantify the treatment contrast for designing, monitoring, and analyzing a comparative clinical study.
    Zhao L; Tian L; Uno H; Solomon SD; Pfeffer MA; Schindler JS; Wei LJ
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 22914867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size planning of two-arm superiority and noninferiority survival studies with discrete follow-up.
    Wellek S
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3123-3136. PubMed ID: 28608389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-sample tests for survival data from observational studies.
    Li C
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2018 Jul; 24(3):509-531. PubMed ID: 28849359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted log-rank test to compare two survival functions in the presence of dependent censoring.
    Flandre P
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Nov; 21(6):1281-1293. PubMed ID: 35708191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of median survival time and its 95% confidence interval using SAS PROC LIFETEST.
    Talsma PA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 May; 34(3):366-378. PubMed ID: 37144552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A unified approach to power and sample size determination for log-rank tests under proportional and nonproportional hazards.
    Tang Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1211-1234. PubMed ID: 33819109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.