These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20440121)
1. Physical performance and electromyographic responses to an acute bout of paired set strength training versus traditional strength training. Robbins DW; Young WB; Behm DG; Payne WR; Klimstra MD J Strength Cond Res; 2010 May; 24(5):1237-45. PubMed ID: 20440121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of an upper-body agonist-antagonist resistance training protocol on volume load and efficiency. Robbins DW; Young WB; Behm DG J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Oct; 24(10):2632-40. PubMed ID: 20847705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of a complex agonist and antagonist resistance training protocol on volume load, power output, electromyographic responses, and efficiency. Robbins DW; Young WB; Behm DG; Payne WR J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1782-9. PubMed ID: 20555283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volume Load and Neuromuscular Fatigue During an Acute Bout of Agonist-Antagonist Paired-Set vs. Traditional-Set Training. Paz GA; Robbins DW; de Oliveira CG; Bottaro M; Miranda H J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Oct; 31(10):2777-2784. PubMed ID: 28933712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of agonist-antagonist complex resistance training on upper body strength and power development. Robbins DW; Young WB; Behm DG; Payne WR J Sports Sci; 2009 Dec; 27(14):1617-25. PubMed ID: 19967584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical performance and cardiovascular responses to an acute bout of heavy resistance circuit training versus traditional strength training. Alcaraz PE; Sánchez-Lorente J; Blazevich AJ J Strength Cond Res; 2008 May; 22(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 18438256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Power output and electromyographic activity during and after a moderate load muscular endurance session. Smilios I; Häkkinen K; Tokmakidis SP J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Aug; 24(8):2122-31. PubMed ID: 19834352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upper-lower body super-sets García-Orea GP; Rodríguez-Rosell D; Ballester-Sánchez Á; Da Silva-Grigoletto ME; Belando-Pedreño N PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14636. PubMed ID: 36846453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute effects of antagonist static stretching in the inter-set rest period on repetition performance and muscle activation. Miranda H; Maia Mde F; Paz GA; Costa PB Res Sports Med; 2015; 23(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 25630245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute Hormone Responses Subsequent to Agonist-Antagonist Paired Set vs. Traditional Straight Set Resistance Training. Miranda H; de Souza JAAA; Scudese E; Paz GA; Salerno VP; Vigário PDS; Willardson JM J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1591-1599. PubMed ID: 29979283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How does multi-set high-load resistance exercise impact neuromuscular function in normoxia and hypoxia? Benjanuvatra N; Bradbury D; Landers G; Goods PSR; Girard O Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Jul; 23(7):1223-1232. PubMed ID: 35770524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postexercise Hypotension and Heart Rate Variability Responses Subsequent to Traditional, Paired Set, and Superset Resistance Training Methods. Paz GA; Iglesias-Soler E; Willardson JM; Maia MF; Miranda H J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2433-2442. PubMed ID: 29239982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strength athletes are capable to produce greater muscle activation and neural fatigue during high-intensity resistance exercise than nonathletes. Ahtiainen JP; Häkkinen K J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jul; 23(4):1129-34. PubMed ID: 19528869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Similarity in adaptations to high-resistance circuit vs. traditional strength training in resistance-trained men. Alcaraz PE; Perez-Gomez J; Chavarrias M; Blazevich AJ J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2519-27. PubMed ID: 21659889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of muscle activity and tissue oxygenation during strength training protocols that differ by their organisation, rest interval between sets, and volume. Penzer F; Cabrol A; Baudry S; Duchateau J Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Sep; 116(9):1795-806. PubMed ID: 27439989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Muscle Damage and Muscle Activity Induced by Strength Training Super-Sets in Physically Active Men. Brentano MA; Umpierre D; Santos LP; Lopes AL; Radaelli R; Pinto RS; Kruel LFM J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jul; 31(7):1847-1858. PubMed ID: 27243916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuromuscular responses for resistance training sessions adopting traditional, superset, paired set and circuit methods. Paz GA; Maia MF; Salerno VP; Coburn J; Willardson JM; Miranda H J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 Dec; 59(12):1991-2002. PubMed ID: 31113178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of different rest intervals between antagonist paired sets on repetition performance and muscle activation. Maia MF; Willardson JM; Paz GA; Miranda H J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2529-35. PubMed ID: 25148302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Synergist vs. NonSynergist Split Resistance Training Routines on Acute Neuromuscular Performance in Resistance-Trained Men. Castanheira RPM; Ferreira-Junior JB; Celes RS; Rocha-Junior VA; Cadore EL; Izquierdo M; Bottaro M J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Dec; 31(12):3482-3488. PubMed ID: 28002176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Muscle activation patterns while lifting stable and unstable loads on stable and unstable surfaces. Kohler JM; Flanagan SP; Whiting WC J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):313-21. PubMed ID: 20072068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]