These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20440154)
1. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Baumann DP; Lin HY; Chevray PM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 May; 125(5):1335-1341. PubMed ID: 20440154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Chevray PM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Kroll SS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 10987463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Lee KT; Mun GH Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap. Garvey PB; Clemens MW; Hoy AE; Smith B; Zhang H; Kronowitz SJ; Butler CE Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 24469158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Selber JC; Fosnot J; Nelson J; Goldstein J; Bergey M; Sonnad S; Serletti JM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1438-1453. PubMed ID: 21042100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function? Selber JC; Samra F; Bristol M; Sonnad SS; Vega S; Wu L; Serletti JM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 18626349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction. Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perfusion-related complications are similar for DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps harvested on medial or lateral deep inferior epigastric Artery branch perforators for breast reconstruction. Garvey PB; Salavati S; Feng L; Butler CE Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):581e-589e. PubMed ID: 22094755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction. Wang XL; Liu LB; Song FM; Wang QY Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 24902911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis. Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction. Selber JC; Nelson J; Fosnot J; Goldstein J; Bergey M; Sonnad SS; Serletti JM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1142-1153. PubMed ID: 20885239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference? Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Chen CM; Halvorson EG; Disa JJ; McCarthy C; Hu QY; Pusic AL; Cordeiro PG; Mehrara BJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Nov; 120(6):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 18040176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]