These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20441124)

  • 1. [Long-term clinical evaluation of 2 dental materials used for the preparation of esthetic inlays].
    Khairallah C; Hokayem A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Sep; 32(127):5-13. PubMed ID: 20441124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical study comparing at 5 years a ceramic and a ceromer used for making esthetic inlays].
    Khairallah C; Sabbagh J; Hokayem A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):21-8. PubMed ID: 20069963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.
    Habekost Lde V; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R; Hehn J; Hajtó J; Krämer N; Naumann M; Koch A; Roggendorf MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth.
    Scheibenbogen A; Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 9791786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of light-emitting diode (LED) curing modes on resin/dentin bond strength.
    Fahmy N; Naguib H; Guindy JE
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):670-5. PubMed ID: 19682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of mechanical loading on the cusp defection of premolars restored with direct and indirect techniques.
    Zamboni SC; Nogueira L; Bottino MA; Sobrinho LC; Valandro LF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 24939269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
    Shannon A
    Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: an in vivo investigation.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20830881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overlays or ceramic fragments for tooth restoration: an analysis of fracture resistance.
    Tavarez RR; Firoozmand LM; Silva MB; Malheiros AS; Bandéca MC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 24939265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cement shade and water storage on the final color of leucite-reinforced ceramics.
    Karaagaclioglu L; Yilmaz B
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 18666495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
    Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.