These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Authors' financial interests should be made known to manuscript reviewers. de Melo-Martín I; Intemann K Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7150):129. PubMed ID: 17625543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. "Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by plastic and reconstructive surgery". Orbay H; Sensöz O Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Aug; 118(2):579-80; author reply 580-1. PubMed ID: 16874271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The perils of journal and supplement publishing. Lancet; 2010 Jan; 375(9712):347. PubMed ID: 20113807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Managing conflicts of interest: who is responsible? Nahai F Aesthet Surg J; 2009; 29(4):330-2. PubMed ID: 19717068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process. Hak DJ; Giannoudis P; Mauffrey C Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 26724808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing ethical and peer review standards of medical journals. Dickens B; Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 May; 133(2):249-50. PubMed ID: 26972183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Our editorial process--some experiences and reflections. Emmelin M; Wall S Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 12850969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns. Satyanarayana K; Sharma A Indian J Med Res; 2010 Aug; 132():119-22. PubMed ID: 20716810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. New policies aim to minimize potential or actual conflicts of interest. Svirsky MA Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):85. PubMed ID: 15064653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reviewing reviewers. Kay S Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Jan; 58(1):1. PubMed ID: 15629160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Little fish are less likely to take the bait. Marcovitch H PLoS Med; 2005 Jul; 2(7):e221. PubMed ID: 16033315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Conflict of interest, an unspoken reality in science. Danda D Int J Rheum Dis; 2014 Feb; 17(2):131. PubMed ID: 24576269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality? García-Doval I PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Focus on the funding and production of evidence rather than its publication. Sheldon T PLoS Med; 2005 Jul; 2(7):e222. PubMed ID: 16033316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of sponsored supplements in a peer-reviewed journal. Nahai F Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Feb; 32(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 22328695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider. Kulstad E PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [The ideal medical journal in the age of IT]. Nylenna M Lakartidningen; 2004 Jan; 101(1-2):60-3. PubMed ID: 14763006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]