These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20442340)

  • 21. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
    Hong G
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Propensity score methods in observational research: brief review and guide for authors.
    Andrew BY; Alan Brookhart M; Pearse R; Raghunathan K; Krishnamoorthy V
    Br J Anaesth; 2023 Nov; 131(5):805-809. PubMed ID: 37481434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes.
    Dahabreh IJ; Sheldrick RC; Paulus JK; Chung M; Varvarigou V; Jafri H; Rassen JA; Trikalinos TA; Kitsios GD
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(15):1893-901. PubMed ID: 22711757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.
    Stuart BL; Grebel LE; Butler CC; Hood K; Verheij TJM; Little P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Sep; 67(662):e643-e649. PubMed ID: 28760739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research.
    Barnieh L; James MT; Zhang J; Hemmelgarn BR
    J Nephrol; 2011; 24(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 21404223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.
    Hayati Rezvan P; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():30. PubMed ID: 25880850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. observational studies: propensity score analysis of non-randomized data.
    Trojano M; Pellegrini F; Paolicelli D; Fuiani A; Di Renzo V
    Int MS J; 2009 Sep; 16(3):90-7. PubMed ID: 19878631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A practical guide to propensity score analysis for applied clinical research.
    Lee J; Little TD
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Nov; 98():76-90. PubMed ID: 28153337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses.
    Kuss O
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 23972521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.
    Schulte PJ; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29750691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical Research Methodology 3: Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Sessler DI; Imrey PB
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1052-1064. PubMed ID: 26378705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3357-72. PubMed ID: 23553813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hansen BB
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2050-4; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18407561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unknown confounders did not bias the treatment effect when improving balance of known confounders in randomized trials.
    Kuss O; Miller M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():9-16. PubMed ID: 32540383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Common errors in the design of orthopaedic studies.
    Bono CM; Tornetta P
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 16473355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.