232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20443480)
1. Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise.
Reiser I; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1591-600. PubMed ID: 20443480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space.
Chawla AS; Lo JY; Baker JA; Samei E
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4859-69. PubMed ID: 19994493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance.
Gang GJ; Lee J; Stayman JW; Tward DJ; Zbijewski W; Prince JL; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1754-68. PubMed ID: 21626910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhou J; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1098-109. PubMed ID: 17441255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Generalized NEQ and Detectability Index for Tomosynthesis and Cone-Beam CT: From Cascaded Systems Analysis to Human Observers.
Gang GJ; Lee J; Stayman JW; Tward DJ; Zbijewski W; Prince JL; Siewerdsen JH
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2010 Mar; 7622():. PubMed ID: 24307930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A mathematical model platform for optimizing a multiprojection breast imaging system.
Chawla AS; Samei E; Saunders RS; Lo JY; Baker JA
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1337-45. PubMed ID: 18491528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.
Chan HP; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA; Zelakiewicz S; Schmitz A; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Nees AV; Neal CH; Carson P; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):675-85. PubMed ID: 25007048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cascaded systems analysis of noise and detectability in dual-energy cone-beam CT.
Gang GJ; Zbijewski W; Webster Stayman J; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5145-56. PubMed ID: 22894440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of optical blurring of X-ray source on breast tomosynthesis image quality: Modulation transfer function, anatomical noise power spectrum, and signal detectability perspectives.
Lee C; Baek J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267850. PubMed ID: 35587494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.
Hu YH; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5242-52. PubMed ID: 19175083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality.
Samei E; Saunders RS
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6359-78. PubMed ID: 21908902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A virtual trial framework for quantifying the detectability of masses in breast tomosynthesis projection data.
Young S; Bakic PR; Myers KJ; Jennings RJ; Park S
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051914. PubMed ID: 23635284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
